mike the wiz writes:
There is no difference between the universe existing and not existing,
Meaningless sentence, as you are comparing two things -- the sum total of all things (which would therefore contain both of the above things) and the absence of all things (in which case you'd have neither of the above things.)
So, you need a universe to exist to have, "the universe doesn't exist;" and if the universe exists, it doesn't not exist.
mike the wiz writes:
But it isn't because in times past, atheists have tried to show that there is no credence in Theists saying that humans are special. Or they have tried to show that we are not special. Yet this proves that logically, we are special.
You're using 'special' equivocally.
mike the wiz writes:
This isn't an argument for Theism as such, but I disagree with the notion that we are not special. This argument hints at, and favours Theism,
No it doesn't.
"My laptop is the only one sitting on my desk; thus it's special."
Does that favor theism? Nope. It's an entirely irrelevant usage of 'special'.
Edited by DominionSeraph, : No reason given.