|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Dialogue Between Satan and God in the Book of Job | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Since God brought up the subject of Job, how do you figure Satan "manipulated" Him?
Did I "manipulate" you into starting this topic? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
honda33 writes: The conversation starter is not immune from manipulation. Where is there any sign of manipulation by Satan? God initiated the conversation:
quote: God initiated the subject of Job:
quote: God challenged Satan to mess with Job:
quote: God put limits on what Satan could do to Job:
quote: Where in the passage does Satan come across as anything but a minion? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes: What is important is that Satan's technique gains him power from God.... God says to Satan, "Look what a fine, upstanding man Job is." Satan responds, "I bet he wouldn't be so loyal to you if you took away his cars and houses and dancing girls." God throws it back at him, "No, you do your worst. That way you can't claim I went easy on him." The challenge is to Satan from God. He doesn't gain power from God - he gets permission to test Job. And remember that Satan loses the "bet", so there is no possibility of him being smarter than God.
It would be like hunting down Osama Bin-Laden and then puting him in power in place of the president. Bad analogy. Bin-Laden is an enemy, Satan is an employee. (The story would start with Bin-Laden strolling into a cabinet meeting and Dubya asking him what he's been up to.) It is, after all, a story. The moral of the story is that bad things can happen to good people but good people can still be good. "Evil" doesn't really enter into it at all. The misfortunes that befall Job are facts of everyday life, in no way comparable to terrorist attacks. The character "Satan" is not the personification of evil - he's the personification of bad happenstance. So the God in the story isn't "evil" - He just acknowledges that life on earth isn't perfect. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Chiroptera writes: Bin Laden started off as an employee.... I knew somebody was going to bring that up.... But in the Book of Job, Satan is always an employee. Why else would he be at the board meeting? Was Hitler at Yalta? If anything, Satan's stature decreases in the Book of Job. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes: Satan is an evil-doer. Where is that indicated in your passage or anywhere in the Book of Job? Chapter and verse?
God gives him permission to do evil unto His most loyal follower who's done nothing to deserve this evil. What "evil" is done to Job? What happens to him that doesn't happen to other people every day? As I have said, bad things happened to Job. Big deal. So what? That's part of life. The story is about Job's reaction to misfortune - it's not about "evil". If you think there was something unusual in what happened to him, spell it out.
... lets hold back from going into the moral of the rest of the story. How come you can make up stuff about "evil" that isn't in the story at all and I can't point out that you're wrong? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
fallacycop writes: May be he knew, to begin with, that he was going to lose that bet, but all that he wanted was an oportunity to do some evil with God`s belobed Job. Maybe he flew around in a zeppelin dropping silver dollars on the poor - but that isn't in the story and neither is anything about "evil". By the way, how may lobes do you suppose Job had? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
kuresu writes: he should perhaps realize that english is not your first language. It isn't mine either - it's just the only one I have left. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes: Job 1:11 -- But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face. Do these sound like the words of someone with good intentions and a good heart? What do "good intentions and a good heart" have to do with it? You've been claiming that Satan "manipulated" God. If that was true, it would indicate that He is gullible, not evil. If God was evil, wouldn't He be doing the manipulating? But nothing you've said - other than your own opinion - shows that God was manipulated. You've been shown from the context of the story that God won the exchange - hardly a sign that He was manipulated. Your only comeback has been to whine that you don't want to look at the context. This is Bible Study. It's time for you to step up to the plate and show where the text backs up your claims. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes: I gave you that bit of text (words of Satan, not God) which clearly indicates his evil intent.... And I have been trying to get through to you that the text does not indicate "evil intent". Satan says to God:
quote: and God throws back the challlenge:
quote: Satan is given permission to take away what Job has - e.g. his property and his children. Bankruptcies happen every day. Children die every day. Those events are unpleasant, unfortunate, unwelcome... but they are not "evil". You have yet to show any indication of "evil" in the story.
It doesn't matter what happens with Job. Of course it matters what happens to Job. That's the only thing that matters. Why do you think they named the story after Job? You can not draw any kind of conclusion from any part of the story without considering the context of what happens to Job.
Do you think God would've granted Satan power to hurt Job if he had just walked up to Him and said "yo, I wanna hurt that dude, can I?" You're completely missing the point. Once again, it was God's idea to do the experiment with Job as guinea-pig. There is no indication in the story that Satan wanted to hurt Job - all he said was, "Job wouldn't be so great if you took away his stuff." This is Bible Study. You can not draw conclusions that are not supported by the text. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes: These events are not evil, however, if there were an entity that was causing such "unpleasant, unfortunate, unwelcome" events, would you not find that entity to be evil? Of course not. If the events are not evil, how is the entity that "causes" them evil? Volcanic eruptions, floods, etc. are often "unpleasant, unfortunate and unwelcome" but an entity that allows them to happen isn't evil. That's just the way the world works. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes: Don't think you'll get away with twisting my words. I said CAUSE not allow! They are different. I know. I was correcting you. God ALLOWED Satan to take away Job's riches. He didn't "cause" anything.
And I suppose Sept. 11 was just the "unpleasant, unfortunate, unwelcome" collapsing of some towers? Or was there some evil behind that? If you could show any terrorist attacks in the Book of Job, that question might have some relevance. Job's children were killed when the wind caused their house to collapse. The wind blows every day. Nothing evil about it. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes: you have been arguing that Satan is not evil, and that there's no evidence of him being evil anywhere in the book of Job. But there is. I have been arguing that nothing that happened to Job was "evil". If you think the text shows evil, show us. Chapter and verse.
Planes crash in fields of natural (unintentful) actions regularly. So, this was just another crashing of a plane? The terrorists had an evil intent and that led to an evil result. But you haven't shown evil intent on the part of God or Satan.
But if an entity capable of doing such a thing as making the wind blow so as to knock over a house does just that, does that not make that entity evil? Once again, you're confusing "cause" with "allow". The wind does blow and it does knock houses down. There is no need to "cause" that. The wind happened to knock down Job's son's house and the brothers and sisters died. If they hadn't died that day, they would have died the next day or the next year or decades later. Where is the evil? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
honda33 writes: Maybe they were just carrying out Allah's will, maybe 911 was just a side effect of a bet between Allah and Satan. Empty speculation. We'll discuss it when there's a book in the Bible about it. Don't duck the issue. Show us the evil intent in the Book of Job. Edited by Ringo, : Fixed quote attribution. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes: So, which one are you arguing? Make up your mind! In this thread, I am arguing that there was no "evil intent" in the misfortunes that befell Job. Satan was simply an employee helping God with an experiment. I asked you for evidence that Satan is an "evil-doer" to get you to actually look at the text.
... check out this: Job 42:11 .... Finally... but you didn't have to go that far to find the word "evil". You only had to go to chapter 2. Check out this:
quote: The "evil" refers to misfortune rather than intentional evil like a terrorist attack. Look at the events themselves: Job's flocks were stolen, his servants were killed by the thieves and his children died in a weather-related mishap. None of those events implies intentional "evil" on God's part.
... they were brought upon Job by God Himself, and not Satan.... So what happened to your argument that Satan tricked God into giving him the power?
Are you still going to argue that these things were not evil? I can understand your confusion, since the word "evil" is used to describe the events. But you have to look at the events themselves and understand that the way you have been using the word "evil" does not apply. Look at Job's own words: "shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?" He is saying that there are good things and bad things in life. He is not accusing God of doing "evil" in the same way you are. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
honda33 writes: But you were not speculating when you wrote;
The terrorists had an evil intent and that led to an evil result We know that three other planes were hijacked on that day, with evil result. Does anybody really doubt that the fourth set of hijackers had evil intent, even though their intent was thwarted? My speculation is based on similar events. Yours is based on what? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024