A Guide to the tactics of Evolutionists

This is a lie. This is a lie. This is, in general, a lie. We see such things sometimes due to such things as reduction of population, but it is not generally true. This is not true. I and others have demonstrated that. Read the links in my post. This is either a lie, or you have totally failed to understand the model presented. Did you even bother to read the links?Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This is a lie. I want you to examine, as carefully as you can, the model of genetics that I've presented to you. Instead, you tell me absurd lies about it. This is not argument.

This is a lie. I am not in the least afraid of you, but so long as we can debate on this thread, I have no interest in debating you elsewhere.You tell me that I am afraid of debating you when here I am, right here, debating you --- after you begged the moderators to remove me from this thread --- while you are still whining about the moderators reinstating me on this thread --- so EVERYONE READING THIS THREAD KNOWS THAT YOU ARE A LIAR.How often do I have to explain this?When you tell lies about what has happened on these forums, everyone who subscribes to these forums can read these forums. So they know that you're lying.What's the point?Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

The lie that randman told was as follows: I rebuked his lies by giving definitions.Of course, the theory of evolution has nothing to do with these vague philosophical concepts, and anyone who pretends that there is a connection is a liar. Nonetheless, randman lied when he claimed that "evos" fail to define these things. I have given definitions.Of course, these definitions have nothing to do with the theory of evolution, but as only creationist liars pretend that they do, that is your problem, not mine.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.