Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abortion - Moments of (Mis)Conception
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 41 of 178 (389905)
03-16-2007 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by riVeRraT
03-16-2007 3:11 PM


Re: Clarity
riVeRraT writes:
But we know for sure when the whole process is started, that will eventually create life.
Genesis 1:1.
As RAZD has pointed out, there is no such thing as the "start" of life. Life continues from one generation to the next. Every cell is alive, whether it is a separate organism or not. Before we were conceived, we were part of our parents. After we die, something will eat our components and life will go on.
Why pick one magical moment when it is no longer okay to interrupt the process?
Since birth control is not 100%, and abortion should not used as a form of birth control....
Why "shouldn't" abortion be used as a backup to birth control?
The best method of automobile safety is don't run into things. But what's wrong with using seatbelts as a backup?
Edited by Ringo, : Spellling.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by riVeRraT, posted 03-16-2007 3:11 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-16-2007 4:26 PM ringo has not replied
 Message 44 by riVeRraT, posted 03-16-2007 4:34 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 46 of 178 (389917)
03-16-2007 5:04 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by riVeRraT
03-16-2007 4:34 PM


Consistency
riVeRraT writes:
It is never ok to interrput the process.
As I pointed out, The Process™ began on Day One and continues every day, through today and into the future. It's interrupted all the time by individual deaths. We interrupt it all the time by warfare and by "justice" and by crime.
Specifically to this topic, The Process™ is interrupted every time a sperm dies, every time an egg dies, every time implantation fails, every time a woman spontaneously miscarries....
To say it is never "ok" to interrupt the process is nonsense. The vast majority of the interruptions you have no complaint about.
Try to be just a little bit consistent. If it is "never" okay to interrupt the process, then let's see you speak out against all the interruptions: every lost sperm, every lost egg, every miscarriage, every war, every execution....
Because automobiles and pregnancy have nothing to do with each others.
Of course they do. The safety issues are identical. Don't evade the issue.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by riVeRraT, posted 03-16-2007 4:34 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by riVeRraT, posted 03-16-2007 7:37 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 52 of 178 (389938)
03-16-2007 8:13 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by riVeRraT
03-16-2007 7:37 PM


Re: Consistency
riVeRraT writes:
What does that have to do with the creation of life inside a mother's womb?
Everything.
There is no "creation of life" inside a mother's womb. The sperm and the egg are already alive long before conception.
By that analogy, then it is ok to kill, period.
On the contrary. Every case must be decided individually.
Do we go to war with this country? If we do, do I join up? If I might kill civilians, do I pull the trigger anyway?
Do I shoot a burglar to protect my family? Does a police officer shoot if he might hit a civilian?
Does a surgeon transplant a kidney when there's a risk to the donor?
There's no black/white, yes/no, on/off like you suggest.
I do not like war, murder, abortion, killing innocent animals for no apperent reason,
Yet again you ignore the sperm cells that die, the egg cells that die, the implantations that fail, the miscarriages. Why aren't all of those a "loss of life" for you to boo-hoo over? If a woman miscarries on her way to an abortion clinic, what's the difference?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by riVeRraT, posted 03-16-2007 7:37 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by riVeRraT, posted 03-16-2007 11:00 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 64 of 178 (389971)
03-17-2007 12:27 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by riVeRraT
03-16-2007 11:00 PM


Re: Consistency
riVeRraT writes:
The subject here is human life, not life in general.
That's the point: there is no exact moment when "life in general" becomes human life.
At one point in time we have a sperm and an egg, and you're perfectly willing to let them die, to throw them away. Then there's another point in time when you say it's suddenly "wrong" to throw some of them away, but it's okay to throw others away.
And the only difference between the disposable ones and the "human" ones is that half the disposable DNA came from a rapist.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by riVeRraT, posted 03-16-2007 11:00 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 124 of 178 (390221)
03-19-2007 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by ICANT
03-19-2007 12:24 PM


Re: Re-Pain
ICANT writes:
If it is justified does that make it right?
Yes. To "justify" means to show that it is right. (Why doesn't a pastor know that?)
The fetus that was aborted was a male child and I never got to hold him.
Nor did you get to hold all the sperm cells, egg cells and other "potential grandchildren" that never developed. The question remains: Why do you pick an arbitrary step along the gestation trail?
Why was that fetus a "grandchild" and the cells that joined to make it were not?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 12:24 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 1:31 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 128 of 178 (390233)
03-19-2007 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by ICANT
03-19-2007 1:31 PM


Re: Justify
ICANT writes:
"The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000..justify, warrant These verbs mean to be a proper or sufficient reason for:..."
It does not say make it right.
Yes it does. If there is a "proper or sufficient reason", it is right.
But right and wrong are not the topic here.
I believe that when the sperm and egg fuse (conception) the fetus becomes a living soul.
I know that's your opinion. I'm asking why do you choose that moment for the soul to enter?
What's the difference between a sperm and an egg that are two millimeters apart and a sperm and an egg that sre holding hands? What is the biological basis for your opinion and/or what is the Biblical basis for your opinion?
(By the way, that is the topic here - see the OP.)

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 1:31 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 2:01 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 133 of 178 (390240)
03-19-2007 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by ICANT
03-19-2007 2:01 PM


Re: Justify
ICANT writes:
You can take the 2 put them two millimeters apart and as long as they do not unite they will never produce a human being.
As you have been told repeatedly, most of those that do unite will never produce a human being either. They fail to implant or they abort spontaneously for whatever reason.
Why do you not consider all of those failures "human"?
Once again, why pick one magic moment for humanification? How is that magic moment unique, either biologically or Biblically?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 2:01 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 2:54 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 140 of 178 (390253)
03-19-2007 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by ICANT
03-19-2007 2:54 PM


Re: Justify
ICANT writes:
There has to be a beginning.
As I have said before, the beginning of life was in Genesis 1. Since then, there has been a continuum of life. The sperm and egg cells are alive, the failed implants are/were alive....
But when does an individual human life begin?
"There has to be a beginning" says absolutely nothing about when the beginning has to be. It is becoming fairly clear that there is no basis - either biologically or Biblically for your arbitrary opinion.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 2:54 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 3:08 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 143 of 178 (390257)
03-19-2007 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by ICANT
03-19-2007 3:08 PM


Re: Justify
ICANT writes:
either biologically or Biblically for your arbitrary opinion.
Why do I have to have one it is my opinion and no one elses.
Repeating your unfounded opinions over and over and over is boring.
You might as well be saying, "I like ice cream! I like ice cream!"
This is a discussion forum, not your personal blog.
A discussion requires some contribution beyond mere opinions.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 3:08 PM ICANT has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 158 of 178 (390301)
03-19-2007 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by ICANT
03-19-2007 5:40 PM


ICANT writes:
I think I have stated enough times what I believe about murder being the taking of human life.
What you haven't stated - and what the topic is about - is what makes a fetus a "human life".
You clearly have not thought that through - and you clearly don't want to.
Nobody can help you understand (and frankly, I don't think your couselling will be effective if you don't understand) as long as your mind is closed as tight as a bear trap.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2007 5:40 PM ICANT has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024