"Scholarship" does not "define ToE" as "natural selection". This is why you cannot quote a single scholar offering that as a definition.
You are unread and completely ignorant.
(Incidentally, I notice that the definition you attribute to "scholarship" is quite different from the one you attribute to Phillip Johnson. Is this, in your opinion, because he is a liar, or simply because he is not a "scholar"?)
Johnson is a recognized scholar.
Evolution is a change in allele frequencies. If you think you can give me an example of evolution without allele frequencies changing, let us know.
A change in gene frequencies is the geneticist definition of evolution. It is not the only valid definition of evolution.
Evolution is observed as well as inferred, surely you know that?
Evolution is inferred; it cannot be observed in real time because it is too slow. What happens in the molecular universe is not falsifiable as one must take the word of the scientist on it, whether an Evolutionist or Creationist.
Evolution is not observable. This makes it much like Creationism: we do not get to see exactly when God creates by special creation. Like evolution, special creation is inferred after the fact.
Now that I know you are unread and ignorant I will not be reading anymore of your messages.
Ray