Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Issues of light
Gzus
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 90 (35147)
03-24-2003 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jesuslover153
03-24-2003 3:42 PM


Hmmm. Some people believe that the universe was an unfortunate by-product of a strange experiment. What's your opinion on whether or not God has a tail?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jesuslover153, posted 03-24-2003 3:42 PM Jesuslover153 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Jesuslover153, posted 03-24-2003 5:53 PM Gzus has replied

  
Gzus
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 90 (35347)
03-26-2003 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Jesuslover153
03-24-2003 5:53 PM


quote:
I certainly know that God has no tail.
I disagree. I believe that God has many tails. What about beards?
[This message has been edited by Gzus, 03-26-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Jesuslover153, posted 03-24-2003 5:53 PM Jesuslover153 has not replied

  
Gzus
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 90 (39691)
05-11-2003 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Philip
05-11-2003 1:45 AM


Re: Light and Time
How are your 'what if's any better than pure speculation?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Philip, posted 05-11-2003 1:45 AM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Philip, posted 05-12-2003 11:16 PM Gzus has not replied

  
Gzus
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 90 (40266)
05-15-2003 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by Philip
05-12-2003 11:51 PM


Re: Light and Time
quote:
Common sense discussions about light seem really common stupidity discussions. Every honest scientist would tell you both quantum theories on light and relativistic ones defy commnon (i.e., Newtonian) sense on the subject.
Newtonian physics is taught mainly in highschool and makes no real attempt at an explanation of light. I think you'll find, if you study a bit further, that it gets a wee bit more complicated and weird than the classical 19th century view of physics. I doubt that any 'common sense discussion' would result in any real understanding of light, the ideas are quite complex. Perhaps you should study a bit further.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Philip, posted 05-12-2003 11:51 PM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Philip, posted 05-20-2003 1:58 AM Gzus has replied

  
Gzus
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 90 (40919)
05-21-2003 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Philip
05-20-2003 1:58 AM


Re: Light and Time
Are you trying to say that our present inability to develop a complete understanding of light means that light therefore has some supernatural secret? Sounds a bit loopy to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Philip, posted 05-20-2003 1:58 AM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Philip, posted 05-29-2003 1:49 AM Gzus has replied

  
Gzus
Inactive Member


Message 79 of 90 (41844)
05-31-2003 11:27 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by Philip
05-29-2003 1:49 AM


Re: Light and Time
You still haven't told me why our inability to [presently] understand light completely, necessarily means that it is in any way supernatural. Your argument just doesn't follow logically.
Would you have said the same thing of particle physics in the 19th Century?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Philip, posted 05-29-2003 1:49 AM Philip has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024