For one thing Humphreys did not state that an event horizon expanded the universe it is a white hole...
Now just so you know I do conclude that Humphreys is a scientist, I myself do not believe everything that he said...
I agree with most but I differ in these areas;
1. I do not think that water, even a vast amount of it, would collapse on itself if there was not gravity,
2. Gravity came into being when God said 'Let there be light'
3. The light of day one was covered by the solidifcation of the serface of the earth.
4. The Sun, moon, and stars of day 4 are the reason why I believe in the above statement...
Now I think I may be an insult to your intelligence because you have no desire to know what I am thinking, and you certainly have no desire to help me along the way in my travel unless I conform to your way of thinking... now on account of a few million or billion people who may support uniformitarianistic thought I will not toss out my the development of my theory, and neither will I be daunted by any insults that can and will be thrown at me... God is real... you prove to me that he is not... I have the proof I need to believe this... all things will be revealed in time...
I appeal to you whom know where I can gain more information on the basis of light.. its origination and how it is effected by gravity...
I do find reading a delight and would much rather further my theory by having solid works to further my own enlightenment on these issues.... insulting me does nothing but give us both a bad taste in our mouths...
[This message has been edited by Jesuslover153, 03-29-2003]