it is my personal belief that evolution is true, but that the starting point is not singular.
evolutionist know that evolution is like a tree, and each change as something evolves is like a new branch in that tree.
but the fault, in my opinion is that evolutionists are digging through a forest, not a single tree.
and current evidence supports that.
in my cat is a cat suggestion, I'm not saying that the first cat resembled anything similar to what a cat is now, but that in the tree of the cat, the starting point of the "cat was still a cat even if they don't look anything alike.
and that ill assert that evolution if it was a finished science with all evidence it would still not prove God does not exist, but perhaps would only have to conclude; (if ALL evidence was found and finished even the starting point of biological "explosion" as i would call it), that God is.
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides