Hi sup32string,
One can not weigh the evidence if said evidence is in question. I was hoping by writing this, that all who read it, may re-look at all the information already given at this point, and understand why I question the evidence.
By not addressing any of the specifics of the rebuttals and by merely restating your premis you give the strong impression that you wish to avoid examining the evidence. You have explained how it is possible that the available sources may have experienced tempering and/or fabrication, but that only means that it is possible, not that it happened. In order to make your case that it happened you will have to examine and discuss the actual sources themselves and looking for internal and external contradictions, inconsistencies, impossibilities, etc.
Rule 2 of the
Forum Guidelines states:
Debate in good faith by addressing rebuttals through the introduction of new information or by providing additional argument. Do not merely keep repeating the same points without elaboration.
You have made your position clear. Now it is time to make your case.
------------------
-- | Percy |
| EvC Forum Administrator |
[Fix link to Forum Guidelines. --Admin]
[This message has been edited by Admin, 07-28-2003]