Paging johnfolton. Bring your evidence for a young earth.

Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

Your reply is a jumble. Take one item at a time and focus on that.Right now the topic that Coyote has introduced is the RATE groups work. Stick to that until you and he have finished beating it to death. Why would you reply to a post that is only discussing that without mentioning it?It seems the only thing you are bringing from the Bible is "appearance of age". If you suggest that is the reason (and the RATE group agrees with you it seems) that science sees and old earth then just say so.You don't need all the rest of the what you posted. Do you intend to use only that? If so I think you should start a thread in the Bible area as it has very strong theological implications.For all the rest, take one and only one item at a time.This isn't easy but that is the way it is if you actually want to have "opinions" in the sciences. You actually have to "earn" them by supporting them with evidence and logic.As for Walt Brown, it doesn't matter where it comes from. Just bring his evidence in one bit at a time. That is evidence not speculations.In summary: The subtopic for now is the RATE groups report. Deal with it!

You haven't finished with the RATE group yet. You can get to Gentry's halos later.Do not muddle things up!

JF (aka a lot of things) if you continue with the made up nonsense you will be suspended again. It will quickly become lenghty.

If you ever had anything sound that supported a young earth that would be interesting.The "nonsense" this time was your PS. It is just chaotic words without any value whatsoever. Do not post crap!