Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   We youth at EvC are in Moral Decline
doctrbill
Member (Idle past 2794 days)
Posts: 1174
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Joined: 01-08-2001


Message 136 of 253 (49779)
08-10-2003 3:59 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by truthlover
08-09-2003 11:11 PM


truthlover writes:
I'm not following the story. Did the parents get fined for the kid's crime? Did the police confiscate the parents' house? Did the parents just happen to lose the house on the same day, and you're pointing out that they couldn't get a lawyer? Could you fill in the blanks for me?
Our Little Rico (sp?) law (like the ones during Prohition in the 30's) allows the state to confiscate all of their assets, including bank accounts. And yes, due to the behaviour of their child. Guilty until proven innocent. The law was instituted in order to shut down pot farms and disable the infrastructure of drug dealers. Sounded good on paper, but ...
As I recall, they were eventually exonerated but not before enduring mental anguish, abject poverty, social embarrassment, and homelessness. Imagine how this looks on their record. I wonder how can one hold a job under such circumstances. How does one shower, change clothing, eat breakfast, get to work? Will they be fired, now that they're felons? Will anyone hire them in the future?
db

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by truthlover, posted 08-09-2003 11:11 PM truthlover has not replied

  
doctrbill
Member (Idle past 2794 days)
Posts: 1174
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Joined: 01-08-2001


Message 137 of 253 (49787)
08-10-2003 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by nator
08-10-2003 12:21 AM


schrafinator writes:
Couldn't have said it better m'self.
I like you DrBill.
I'd say what I feel but then your husband would have to kill me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by nator, posted 08-10-2003 12:21 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by nator, posted 08-12-2003 4:37 PM doctrbill has replied

  
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4088 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 138 of 253 (50059)
08-11-2003 10:33 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by nator
08-10-2003 12:52 PM


Could it be because the taxes the German government take out of his earnings go towards services that actually benefit him, such as national health care and low-cost, subsidized transportation and housing?
Could be. The health care over there is much more affordable (or was in 1990) than over here, and so is health insurance (of course, since those go hand in hand). Public transportation is also better (although not as good as I had as a kid in Taiwan in the early 70's, and perhaps not as good as say, San Francisco with BART and the trolleys or NY with its subways, I'm not sure).
I don't know about subsidized housing. The landlords and landladies I had over there didn't sound like they were being subsidized.
I definitely think a lot less people fall through the cracks over there.
As one more aside, I found out today that I can't give blood indefinitely because of I was in Germany over 5 years between 1980 and 1996, and because more than 6 months of that was in the military. Mad Cow disease is what the nurse told me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by nator, posted 08-10-2003 12:52 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by crashfrog, posted 08-12-2003 3:04 AM truthlover has not replied

  
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4088 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 139 of 253 (50060)
08-11-2003 10:37 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by nator
08-10-2003 12:52 PM


Do you really think that working at McDonalds is a career path that sets up lots of undereducated people for success.
No, of course not, but that's not what I was saying. I was asking why anyone would be stuck at minimum wage forever. It's hard for me to imagine that anyone holding a job for a long period would be at minimum wage the whole time, or that they couldn't eventually find another minimum wage job that wouldn't leave them there. I never made minimum wage even working for Manpower temp services, although sometimes I didn't make much more.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by nator, posted 08-10-2003 12:52 PM nator has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 140 of 253 (50074)
08-12-2003 3:04 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by truthlover
08-11-2003 10:33 PM


As one more aside, I found out today that I can't give blood indefinitely because of I was in Germany over 5 years between 1980 and 1996, and because more than 6 months of that was in the military. Mad Cow disease is what the nurse told me.
Yes, I discovered the same thing a year or two ago when the Red Cross changed the rules - I had lived in England for 6 months or so in 6th grade and that's too long for the Red Cross now. A pity because I had been a very avid blood donor since I was old enough to do so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by truthlover, posted 08-11-2003 10:33 PM truthlover has not replied

  
Mammuthus
Member (Idle past 6504 days)
Posts: 3085
From: Munich, Germany
Joined: 08-09-2002


Message 141 of 253 (50129)
08-12-2003 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by Buzsaw
08-08-2003 9:39 PM


quote:
........And to get closer to topic, the reason many, I say many, not all, cannot pay the rent is moral depravity.
1. Drunkeness
2. Drugs
3. Laziness (let the working taxpayer support me.)
4. Dishonesty (can't be trusted in a job)
5. Thievery (again can't be trusted or record ruined for hiring) 6. Poor rent record. (ruins homes rented in past or spent rent money on drugs or boose.)
7. Flat out refusal to pay rent due even when able.
On and on the list could go.
Hmmm this list largely describes George Bush Jr. (Mr. proud to hold up conservative Christian values) and many heads of major corporations i.e. Waksal the soon to be jailbait ex head Imclone...so it would seem your list of moral depravity is also a key to political and financial success...go figure..or go get drunk and run a country to ruin.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Buzsaw, posted 08-08-2003 9:39 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by John, posted 08-12-2003 10:59 AM Mammuthus has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 142 of 253 (50130)
08-12-2003 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by Mammuthus
08-12-2003 10:55 AM


quote:
.or go get drunk and run a country to ruin.
I'm going to the liquor store right now. Ha... ha... My rise to power has begun! hickup...
Seriously, what you note is pretty scary. I wish it weren't as accurate as it is.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Mammuthus, posted 08-12-2003 10:55 AM Mammuthus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Mammuthus, posted 08-12-2003 11:14 AM John has not replied
 Message 145 by Rrhain, posted 08-12-2003 9:09 PM John has not replied

  
Mammuthus
Member (Idle past 6504 days)
Posts: 3085
From: Munich, Germany
Joined: 08-09-2002


Message 143 of 253 (50137)
08-12-2003 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by John
08-12-2003 10:59 AM


I have tried the getting drunk part without doing the rest of the list..and am still not leader of a country (though I do pay my rent)..it must be the combination of the 7 that makes one a member of the ultra-conservative religious elite ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by John, posted 08-12-2003 10:59 AM John has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 144 of 253 (50201)
08-12-2003 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by doctrbill
08-10-2003 6:01 PM


quote:
I'd say what I feel but then your husband would have to kill me.
Wow.
Cool.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by doctrbill, posted 08-10-2003 6:01 PM doctrbill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by doctrbill, posted 08-12-2003 9:34 PM nator has replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 145 of 253 (50265)
08-12-2003 9:09 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by John
08-12-2003 10:59 AM


Speaking of drunkenness....
There was an item on NPR the other day where it seems that people who drink have higher salaries than those who don't. The social function of work-related gatherings (going out for a drink with the boss) combined with the inhibition-lowering effects of alcohol make for a situation where those who drink are more likely to be in a position to make a good impression upon the boss and get a raise.
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by John, posted 08-12-2003 10:59 AM John has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by Buzsaw, posted 08-12-2003 11:18 PM Rrhain has replied
 Message 149 by Dr Jack, posted 08-13-2003 6:09 AM Rrhain has replied
 Message 153 by truthlover, posted 08-13-2003 4:01 PM Rrhain has not replied

  
doctrbill
Member (Idle past 2794 days)
Posts: 1174
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Joined: 01-08-2001


Message 146 of 253 (50268)
08-12-2003 9:34 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by nator
08-12-2003 4:37 PM


Phew! What a relief. That you took so long to comment had me worried. I went over what I'd said a hundred times and began to think that I had offended you.
Glad you're back.
db

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by nator, posted 08-12-2003 4:37 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by nator, posted 08-19-2003 6:01 PM doctrbill has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 147 of 253 (50282)
08-12-2003 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by Rrhain
08-12-2003 9:09 PM


quote:
Speaking of drunkenness....
There was an item on NPR the other day where it seems that people who drink have higher salaries than those who don't. The social function of work-related gatherings (going out for a drink with the boss) combined with the inhibition-lowering effects of alcohol make for a situation where those who drink are more likely to be in a position to make a good impression upon the boss and get a raise.
You begin your post with the implication that you're going to address drunkenness. Then you switch to drinking in your statement. Which is it? I'm quite sure a pattern of drunkenness is not going to get one far. My post did not specify drinking. I drink both wine and beer moderately myself, as the Lord Jesus and his apostles did drink wine. It is drunkenness and gluttony that the Bible warns of, and for obvious reasons.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Rrhain, posted 08-12-2003 9:09 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Rrhain, posted 08-13-2003 6:00 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 148 of 253 (50324)
08-13-2003 6:00 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by Buzsaw
08-12-2003 11:18 PM


buz, does the word "tangent" mean nothing to you?
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Buzsaw, posted 08-12-2003 11:18 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 149 of 253 (50326)
08-13-2003 6:09 AM
Reply to: Message 145 by Rrhain
08-12-2003 9:09 PM


Rrhain. It's not speaking of drunkeness though. Only those who drink in moderation gain this benefit (about 2k a year), those who exceed government limits or are frequently drunk do worse.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Rrhain, posted 08-12-2003 9:09 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Rrhain, posted 08-13-2003 6:44 AM Dr Jack has replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 150 of 253 (50332)
08-13-2003 6:44 AM
Reply to: Message 149 by Dr Jack
08-13-2003 6:09 AM


Mr Jack, does the word "tangent" mean anything to you, either?
Drunkenness means you drink. Thus, I pointed out a tangent whereby it seems that people who do drink are better off than people who don't.
And tangentially, many religious groups insist that their members don't drink at all.
By the way, what is your definition of "drunk"? I will probably have a much stricter version than you.
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by Dr Jack, posted 08-13-2003 6:09 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Dr Jack, posted 08-13-2003 8:56 AM Rrhain has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024