Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is belief in God or the Bible necessary to believe in a massive flood.
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 4745 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008


Message 4 of 110 (508793)
05-16-2009 8:23 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by slevesque
05-16-2009 3:13 AM


Science is Without Blinders
Is it possible to explore the idea of a major cataclysmic water event in the past regardless to the fact that the manuscripts have become a religious book ? Or does its implication with a religion somehow put this possibility off-limits ?
Science does not reject an idea because of the company it keeps.
couldn't similar phenomenons have happened on earth and led to a similar result here ?
The reason for the rejection is that there are no similar results in evidence.
It obviously doesn't have to be worldwide lol, since people could have exagerated such an event to the extent it was worldwide.
Who is rejecting the idea of local floods? (Aside from those demanding a worldwide event, of course.)

It is far easier for you, as civilized men, to behave like barbarians than it was for them, as barbarians, to behave like civilized men. Spock, Mirror Mirror

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by slevesque, posted 05-16-2009 3:13 AM slevesque has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024