common ploy of attacking YEC scientists credentials.
Show their credentials.
but on whether their argument itself is valid.
The arguments have been proven to not be valid. Look up the term
PRATT. There I even gave you a link. No matter how many ways they try to repackage them the arguments are proven time and time again to not be valid. Give us one argument they have that is valid. Just one.
Because I believe history has demonstrated, that any new concept/theory is introduced to society through one person, or small group, and usually finds much opposition from the educated people of the day.
They do not have new theories. They are rehashing theories from the bronze age.
Creationist: "I cannot understand why that particular natural phenomenon is the way it is."
IDer: "I agree I can not conceive of a simple answer for that phenomenon"
Creationist: "God did it"
Ider: "No, the intelligent designer(which we believe is the god of the christian bible, even though we try to keep that hidden) did it."
All I was trying to say, was that after reading a number of books, I then discovered that evolution did not have all the answers yet,
Gee, that would make it what? Science? Science does not claim to have all the answers. Only religion makes such a claim.
and there were a number of serious problems yet to overcome.
So tell us what those problems are.
the evidence, what you 'see', does fit your theory. I hope you can at least attempt to do the same, for my theory.
Do you know what a scientific theory is? YEC may be a theory in a broad sense of the word but it is not a SCIENTIFIC theory. How about doing some research on that before you start equivocating.
Links to make things easy since it is my experience that YECers refuse to do even the most basic research before they attack evolution.
Scientific TheoryEquivocation
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts