5 online now:	AZPaul3, PaulK, Tangle, Tanypteryx, Theodoric
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,925 Year: 4,182/9,624 Month: 1,053/974 Week: 12/368 Day: 12/11 Hour: 0/1

EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy ⇒

Joralex and Yaro, open to comment.

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Joralex and Yaro, open to comment.

Yaro

Member (Idle past 6527 days)

Posts: 1797

Joined: 07-12-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 1 of 64 (55582)
09-15-2003 6:27 PM

I figured I would open this thread for anyone wanting to adress issues concerning the debate me and Joralex are having here:

http://EvC Forum: Yaro's 'Logical fallacies' discussion... -->EvC Forum: Yaro's 'Logical fallacies' discussion...

This thread is were you can post your own opinions, and arguments so as not to interupt the dialogue in the main thread. Also, I would love to hear anyone elses answers to the arguments posed.

Replies to this message:
	Message 2 by PaulK, posted 09-15-2003 6:36 PM		Yaro has replied

Yaro

Member (Idle past 6527 days)

Posts: 1797

Joined: 07-12-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 3 of 64 (55649)
09-15-2003 10:31 PM

Reply to: Message 2 by PaulK
09-15-2003 6:36 PM

damn.... I hear crickets over in that forum.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 2 by PaulK, posted 09-15-2003 6:36 PM		PaulK has not replied

Yaro

Member (Idle past 6527 days)

Posts: 1797

Joined: 07-12-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 14 of 64 (55780)
09-16-2003 2:04 PM

Reply to: Message 12 by Joralex
09-16-2003 12:21 PM

Joralex,

Are you still in our Discusion over "logical fallacies"?

Admine posed a question in that thread. He want's to move the topic o the Great Debate forum. He needs your comsent too.

That way it will be a one on one dialogue.

It's up to you tho.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 12 by Joralex, posted 09-16-2003 12:21 PM		Joralex has not replied

Yaro

Member (Idle past 6527 days)

Posts: 1797

Joined: 07-12-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 17 of 64 (55837)
09-16-2003 5:56 PM

Reply to: Message 16 by Prozacman
09-16-2003 5:41 PM

Indeed, this debate seems to be headed in one direction.

God says it's ok, thus it is.

Because I can't understand his deffinition. In that case, how on earth do you make a decision on weather or not to belive?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 16 by Prozacman, posted 09-16-2003 5:41 PM		Prozacman has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 40 by Prozacman, posted 09-17-2003 6:55 PM		Yaro has not replied

Yaro

Member (Idle past 6527 days)

Posts: 1797

Joined: 07-12-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 48 of 64 (56870)
09-22-2003 1:39 AM

Reply to: Message 47 by crashfrog
09-22-2003 1:03 AM

Hmmm... if what you say is true crash, then it says alot about what the bible thinks of women.

Basicaly saying: you didn't screem, so you must be lying now.

But anyway you slice it, it's still pretty messed up stuff.

Again, you draw a logical interpretation. How many logical conclusions have we drawn from this verse? Three!

So how on earth can the bible only have one deffinet meaning. Sorry had to say that.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 47 by crashfrog, posted 09-22-2003 1:03 AM		crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 49 by crashfrog, posted 09-22-2003 2:09 AM		Yaro has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button