|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 65/40 Hour: 1/5 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Harvard Researcher May Have Fabricated Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Bolder-dash writes: Trade secret laws are the reasons industry sponsored scientific testing tends to produce results that favor those industries? No, nor did I say that. Trade Secret laws do prevent the Scientific Method from working. Part of the Scientific Method is open disclosure of data, methods, process, as well as conclusions. Trade Secret laws prevent that from happening. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10084 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
it took OVER 40 YEARS before someone thought that piltdown man was a fraud. So how did they determine that Piltdown Man is a fraud? Care to explain? From what I know, no one ever came forward and admitted that they faked it.
if you think that the 'self-correcting' aspect of science is alive and well think again, the christian church has been detecting frauds for over 2,000 years. Yes, just like that fraud Galileo who had the gall to suggest that the Earth moved about the Sun and not the other way around.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9199 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
the christian church has been detecting frauds for over 2,000 years. we can start with marcion to the gnostics and their books {collected in the nag hammadi library} on up further to the rcc when luthor exposed them and on up to the 21st century. This statement really doesn't say anything does it? What Christian church is it of which you speak? Because for the first 1500 years of this period the Roman Catholic Church was the christian church, but yet in the same sentence you claim they were exposed by Luther(maybe if you spelled names properly people might actually try to take you seriously. Nahh who am I kidding).So this christian church you claim was exposing frauds was itself a fraud? Is that what you are trying to say? Is there one Christian church now? What church would that be. Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
Is there one Christian church now? Yes. The one he goes to. That's the only trve church. Your god believes in Unicorns
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4218 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
if you think that the 'self-correcting' aspect of science is alive and well think again, the christian church has been detecting frauds for over 2,000 years. we can start with marcion to the gnostics and their books {collected in the nag hammadi library} on up further to the rcc when luthor exposed them and on up to the 21st century. Yes that might explain why there are hundreds of Chritian denominations since each claims to be true. They can't seldf correct themselves so they start a new fallatious denomination. Tell me one Christian denomination that does not have flaws. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
archaeologist Inactive Member |
Nobody ever said it was. yes someone did say it or it wouldn't have been quoted. i am going to have to change my quoting habits to make sure editing doesn't take place after i quote theperson.
No we don't, we're not creationists, afterall.
actually you do and creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong' and 'if any man bring a different gospel than the one Jesus and the disiciples brought...' the most uneducated christian can detect fraud.
They are a part of the scientific community. oh pulleeaasssee. that is stretching credibility beyond its snapping point.
students felt they were being pushed to reach a particular conclusion that they thought was incorrect this doesn't cover up the fact that it still took 8 years and HOW MANY students accepted the conclusions and went along with their professor? thousands? science has no morality, no superiority no higher moral code: from may 2009--it took 12 YEARS to discover thisone Scientific Fraud Hits Home | Science-Based Medicine this one is on going http://nov55.com/fraud2.html here is a interesting article The Scientific Fraud Pandemic: Few Honest Scientists Remain, Part I - NaturalNews.com peer review doesn't as i have said before from the article immediately above: announced the retraction of over 70 peer-reviewed studies here is a list of articles documenting scientific fraud Scientific fraud news, articles and information: editorial accomplice
An Example of Scientific Fraud |authorSTREAM
Scientific dishonesty in Journal editing :Scientific dishonesty in Journal editing Or, what can stop fraudsters (from the University of Nottingham, for example) when journal editors support them? http://www.talenco.info then to continue your research at your leisure: http://search.yahoo.com/..._ylt=AnZyBHAvt4eZobz0x72IHBebvZx4 with christianity, people are allowed to start new denominations because true christian churches do not have the legal authority to stop them. any one who cites this as a fact that they keep practicing forgets the example of professor Hwang in Korea who was caught in fraud, lost his government position and funding but continued to do science in the private sector. why didn't other scientists stop him and others who do the same? sorry but you have no argument. Edited by archaeologist, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
archaeologist Inactive Member |
Yes that might explain why there are hundreds of Chritian denominations since each claims to be true. They can't seldf correct themselves so they start a new fallatious denomination. Tell me one Christian denomination that does not have flaws.
faulty logic. it isn't that they cannot self-correct, it is that they do not want to. the truth is there and they have free choice to follow the truth or not. GOD does not strong arm people into following Him. He leaves that up to a person's God given right of free choice. If He strong armed all to follow His way, evolution would not be taught at all anywhere.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
why didn't other scientists stop him and others who do the same? Stop him how? Please be specific.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4218 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
the truth is there and they have free choice to follow the truth or not. That is the point. What is the truth, just what you think it is?
GOD does not strong arm people into following Him. Your god wouldn't have to, He has enough idiots doing that for him now. When someone shows the absolute truth, then maybe I will listen. Since no-one can, the point of acceptance is moot. Edited by bluescat48, : typo There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10084 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
why didn't other scientists stop him and others who do the same? sorry but you have no argument. Perhaps because the other scientists didn't know he was inventing his data whole cloth. Sounds reasonable to me. The fact that scientists have their careers ended when fraud is discovered says a lot about the ethics of the scientific community. If your only complaint is that scientists are not omniscient and omnipresent the I really wonder why you are picking on science and not other professions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subbie Member (Idle past 1283 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: |
actually you do and creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong' and 'if any man bring a different gospel than the one Jesus and the disiciples brought...' QFT Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus. -- Thomas Jefferson For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack Obama We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate ...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2726 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Archaeologist.
archaeologist writes: why didn't other scientists stop him and others who do the same? For the same reasons that non-scientists don't stop other non-scientists who do unethical things:
Scientists are people, and as such, a group of scientists should be expected to act generally like any other group of people. Individual scientists are subject to all the ethical ambiguities and follies of non-scientists, and you'll notice that nobody here has yet claimed otherwise. But, nobody here is arguing that scientists are ethical or moral standouts among people: rather, we argue that the system that we work under, in aggregate, does a good job of modulating the impacts of ethics violations by requiring all theories and experimentation to be made available for scrutiny by others with the expertise to scrutinize it. Edited by Bluejay, : Edited out science-specific phrases in the list of reasons. -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9199 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
So you are in the possession of the secret of determining what is a true Christian?
Your beliefs are the one true set of beliefs for all Christians. I just want a confirmation about what you are saying. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3319 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
archaeologist writes:
Oh, please do tell us who this person was.
yes someone did say it or it wouldn't have been quoted. i am going to have to change my quoting habits to make sure editing doesn't take place after i quote theperson.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4218 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
actually you do and creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong' and 'if any man bring a different gospel than the one Jesus and the disiciples brought...' No it only took ~1500 years of alleged fraud for Luther, Calvin & Pastorius to find the fraud. I'll take 8 or 40 any day. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024