A man practically living alone with only his PC, poor knowledge of english languadge, no previous studies on the matter, not any kind of help or guidance, trying to formulate a comprehensive new theory of evolution , anew paradigm of it. It is really insane. BUT I HAD TO GET IT KNOWN.
If you really cared about this issue you do go to university, study a biology honours degree, do a masters to get some research skills and then do some research.
What point to write on a debate site when you cannot support your points with evidence or reasond arguement?
That's part of the site's rules!
Read the work about domestication by Trut et all suggested by W.K in message 286.you will see there where biology and new knowledge leeds to, very near to what i am saying.
It is nowhere near what you are saying: you say there is intelligence/empathy (which don't mean what the words actually but your own definition of those words) behind evolution.
The paper says that it takes about 20 year to domesticate foxes.
I'm sorry to be harsh but you lack the expertise in the correct field to be debating this. Everything you say has the properties of fantasy. There is no corroberating evidence but you cling to it like a drowning man.
I used to have some pretty wacky ideas about how the world worked. I used to think that time was expanding. But this I asked some questions and let go of that idea because I could not support it and others provided evidences to debunk my ideas.
Have you ever watched a program called 'Dragons Den'? People tout their business ideas to a bunch of investors in the hope of getting some start up cash.
Many times their ideas are so poor that the investors say "your idea is going nowhere, don't waste your time with it".
Your idea is going nowhere, don't waste your time with it.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
™ Version 4.2