Kof2hu's 22 species corresponding to Genesis thread

Uh, no.Science does not rely on magic, superstition, wishful thinking, old wives tales, folklore, what the stars foretell and what the neighbors think, omens, public opinion, astromancy, spells, Ouija boards, anecdotes, Da Vinci codes, tarot cards, sorcery, seances, sore bunions, black cats, divine revelation, table tipping, witch doctors, crystals and crystal balls, numerology, divination, faith healing, miracles, palm reading, the unguessable verdict of history, magic tea leaves, new age mumbo-jumbo, hoodoo, voodoo or any of that other weird stuff.Science relies on evidence and the scientific method.You should try it sometime!

But you are leaving out the most important part of the scientific method! What you are avoiding at all costs is testing your hypothesis against the evidence!Much of this, and other, threads have focused on showing you where your hypothesis does not follow from the evidence, and how it is contradicted by the evidence.If you were following the scientific method you would revise your hypothesis, or abandon it in favor of one that better accommodated the evidence.Instead, you dig in your heels and twist, manipulate, and otherwise mutilate and spindle the evidence in a futile effort to make it fit.That's not science; that's the exact opposite of science: religious apologetics.

I've told you several times that science does not agree with your claim of three races.Why are you ignoring what science actually claims, all the while claiming to follow science?Here's the reference to the Coon and Garn article titled On the Number of Races of Mankind again:Just a moment...You might try reading it this time, even though it refutes your claims. That would be what scientists would do, not just ignore it as you seem inclined to do.

I have referenced a peer-reviewed paper from a scientific journal by two acknowledged experts in the field. (I have quite a number of books by those two experts on my office shelves from my graduate school days and from my subsequent study of human races.)The idea of just three races pretty much died out over 100 years. Because so many traits are involved (both geographical and genetic), and because many of those traits are found with clinal distributions that do not co-vary with one another, many have come to question the concept of race altogether.In spite of all of this you continue to make wild and unsubstantiated claims clearly contradicted by scientific evidence.Unless you can come up with some evidence I can only conclude you're just blowing smoke.