kofh2u writes:
In other words, if my hypothesis that these names in the genealogy represented species, I should be able to find support in scripture for assuming such a possibility.
And you haven't done that. You've failed the peer review. As far as anybody here can tell, all you've done is mangle the scriptures to fit your hypothesis. That's the antithesis of science.
But even if the scriptures did fit your hypothesis, that would only be the beginning. It would still be necessary to determine that the scriptures have some basis in reality.
kofh2u writes:
I should be able to explain comments in the Genesis story with corrsponding events with some form of Scientific evidence, like in the case where Cain kills Abel....
It isn't enough to just come up with a halfway plausible connection between a Bible story and reality. You have to produce hard evidence that Cain and Abel
were two different species of hominid. You can't do that because the Bible states quite plainly that they were brothers, with the same mother and father.
There is no scriptural justification whatsovever for thinking that the people mentioned were anything other than individual people.
™ Version 4.2
(1)