Kof2hu's 22 species corresponding to Genesis thread

I am NOT using allegory.
I am showing a correpondence between the story of human evolution told by the scientists and the genealogy read off the Bible.I make only one assumption as an axiom, that the inordinately long lives attributed to what is presented as individuals really mean much longer durations, but that could not be so stated in the past because it was beyond belief in those tmes.

OH...I assumed you were referring to our present discussion of the genealogy and the one-to-one corrspondence with the paleontology reported in the latest book on that subject.In regard to the Flood story, I am reasoning that the Bible writer would have had no other alternative in telling the actual story we know that follows after the 22 evolutions but to use metaphor.They woulkd have had to "liken" the population explosion Out-of-Africa to a virtual Flood of peoplke who after a total extinction of Neanderthal man would have populated the whole earth up to the mountain tops.That the metaphor itself was an impossible report on the face of it, such an interpretation is warranted since it parallels the actual events.This view that the Flood was metaphor was also used by the scientist who discovered the we are all related to just one man who lived 40,000 years ago when Modern man actually did migrate around the world, Out-of-Africa:SCIENCE:
Christopher Stringer and Peter Andrews proposes that modern humans evolved from archaic Homo sapiens 200,000-150,000 years ago only in Africa and then some of them migrated into the rest of the Old World replacing all of the Neanderthals and other late archaic Homo sapiens beginning around 100,000 years ago.If this interpretation of the fossil record is correct, all people today share a relatively modern African ancestry. All other lines of humans that had descended from Homo erectus presumably became extinct.From this view, the regional anatomical differences that we see among humans today are recent developments--evolving mostly in the last 40,000 years.

?You don't know anything about me except what you read in my posts.I remind you again that the stated Hypothesis that the 22 names in the genealogy correspond to the 22 now extinct humans in our ascent Out-of-Africa.This Hypothesis has been followed by a list of Facts that support this since Darwin first suggested such possible thing could correspond to the Bible.What EXACTLY is it that you believe matters beyond that argument???
And, why are YOU so wacky as to think that your point of view with zero support, except your interpretation is different???

?
How so?What I see here is you want to say I am wrong because my thinking does not meet your specifications somehow... which is mutual of course.I must conclude you are stranger to a logical and rational explantion if that explanation opposes your own views.
Since that seems to be the case, it is your argument that my hypothesis has no support because I am a weak minded thinker regardless of the list of corrsponding science events.LOL

What happens whenever the Facts oppose ANY hypothesis???I am interested in how hard head you people are right now when the Facts support everything I have been saying.The situation here and now is that the church interpretation of Genesis is wrong because of all these facts I have demonstrted, but that does not mean you have blinked an eye lid, but you remain staunchly either anti-bible or anti-evolution.You have asked me a question you need ask YOURSELF.
"What happens now, when YOU see that the very evolution of man matches what the Bible says," if you will accept it?

And I have told YOU it does.Edited by kofh2u, : No reason given.

Hmmm,...I thought I had alredy posted here before I left last week that you list contains chronospecies or duplicates that are just other names given to the same species.When all the Homo erectus duplications above are collected together, the list reduces to 22 as I have consisytently reported here, in spite you complain that amounts to spamming.If you are to backward to get the message, I usually refrain from posting it again.
So check out you list and resist googling to find the facts, instead, take a course in the subject or read the book I recommended.

Not sure what you men here,... but it is the same with science theory as with this theological theory.If future discoveries require we add, change, enlarge, with draw the theory, we do so.But Abel IS accounted for in the genealogy and the paleontology.
He was an early meat-eating ape that was attacked and disappeared early on.
Another such meated arose as Seth in the Genesis story.

?
2007 edition was the latest book by a qualified team of paleontlogists as far as I know.
What was later and what was different?????