Hey Rahvin . . .
Rahvin writes:
There are arguments to be made regarding nuclear power, dronester.
Indeed, I keep making them.
Rahvin writes:
Please do remember that the Fukushima plant didn't just up and melt down under normal operating conditions due to poor oversight or human error or "greed."
Are you kidding me?
Rahvin writes:
But a string of claims that amount to little better than suggestive lies . . .
Ahem, . . . could you please tell me which claims are lies? Be specific:
Nuclear power plants shouldn’t be built near populous zones. They are.
Nuclear Powerplants shouldn’t be placed on fault zones. They are.
Nuclear Powerplants shouldn’t be placed near tsunami risk-areas. They are.
Nuclear Powerplants should be held to high safety regulations and strict monitoring. They aren’t.
Nuclear Powerplants should have adequate safety backups. They don’t.
Nuclear Powerplants should NOT be operated with known design flaws. They are.
Nuclear Powerplants should not store spent fuel rods in non-reinforced, un-secure pools. They are.
Nuclear powerplants can be prone to terrorists
Operating nuclear powerplants are prone to incompetence,
Operating over-sized nuclear powerplants are prone to sheer greed,
(Just wondering Rahvin, you always rush to the aid of nuclear power like one of your own kids is in trouble. What's up with that? I like that your passionate though, I wish more americans cared about some things)