Foundation of Everything

Here's a new theory/concept I've found that I thought I'd share.
It simplifies everything down to the basic relationship of Energy.http://www.gamert.co.ukNot only a theory,but some free software to back it all up with.

No, this is a Abstract Tool demonstrating the relationship between energy and mass.
From it you can determine Ohm's Law, Boyle's Law, Relativity and loads more.

As theories go, this is one of very few that does not rely on Constants or Magic Numbers. In fact it's the only one I know of.There is only 1 constant value used - pi, which doesn't really count because it is a natural number.The speed of light is used, but only to convert results into everyday context - it isn't actually used to determine any of the results. Essentially the speed of light is 1.What other theories, without the use of Magic Numbers can give you the relative time at the singularity of a blackhole, or relativistic mass at 2/3 speed of light or even the velocity of an object from its redshift.

A mathematetical curiousity it may be, but a fairly fundemental one.
The main concluision from the Triangle is that there is a simple set of rules that governs everything in our Universe, and along with the rule that the internal angles of a triangle always adds up to 180, everything always balances out.Some basic findingsPhotons do have mass.
The speed of Gravity and the speed of light are governed by the same principle.
Lorentz was more in tune with relativity than Einstein.
Time is not a dimension.The singularity of a blackhole has similar properties as the pre-BigBang Universe.

Sidelined, do I sense an amount of scepticism ?My calculations put the size of a photon (I assume you meant photon and not electron) as approxiamtely 2x10^-15 that of an electron.Why is Lorentz more in touch with Relativity ?
Einstein stated that matter does not shrink, it is time that is slowed.
From the Triangle, which I assume you've had a play with, you will notice that Time is internal to the system, even when at zero velocity. What happens to Time is depandant on Energy and its Relationships.Before the BigBang, it is accepted by those people who believe in the BigBang theory, that all the energy in the Universe was contained within a singularity. In this singularity because it is dimensionless, there can be no mass and no time, there was only energy.
Now take a look at the blackhole, at the singularity there is absolute density, no time and loads of energy. Very similar don't you think ?As for Gravity, ask you self a question.
Why, if Gravity acts towards an object, are scientists trying to find emmissions from the object ? Wouldn't the force of those emmissions be going in the wrong direction ?

Here's a quote taken from an article in USATodayWe have, however, put an upper limit on the photon rest mass. In 1994, the Charge Composition Explorer spacecraft measured the Earth's magnetic field and physicists used this data to define an upper limit of 0.0000000000000006 electron volts for the mass of photons, with a high certainty in the results. That would put my numbers 'in the ballpark'Let me know where you got your figures from.

At the BlackHole singularity, there is no space time as you put it.
What exists beyond the singularity is not part of the singularity, so how can it have any influence on it.
If the external space-time has some influence over the singularity, then it would presumably have some measue of time or space, so would cease to be a singularity.As for the emmissions, you asked about Gravity. What do you understand as being the properties of a Graviton, and why, if they are so abundant in the Universe has one never been detected ?

Until you asked I'd never actually calculated the mass - when I did, in my haste, I used a straight 1 to 1 relationship between energy and mass for the electron - wrong on my part.
The answer I gave you related essentially to 1 electron volt - which as everybody knows should have been 0.51 MeV - so my number was wrong by a factor of 10^-7.I stand corrected.

Here's the corrected figuresThe range of mass for the photon is:-5.0x10^-21 -> 2.66x10^-21

The Hooper-Luck Triangle is the result of a great deal of research, most of it spent banging our heads against a brick-wall.
Everytime we tried to make sense of current physics theories, we came to a dead end or something that relied on a'Magic Number' to get the thing to work. Half of what we reseached made no sense whatsoever.So we decided to take a different approach - if you can't break something down into its constituent parts, then start at first principles and try to find something that can be built up.
We came up with the Triangle, which, so far, nobody that has seen it has said that it doesn't work. Mostly they want to know where it came from and can they use it.Hence, the software. The site you visited No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.gamert.co.uk was setup for the sole purpose of distributing the software, free to individuals, and providing a forum for people to exchange ideas.If you're not sure about downloading the software, check the Info page, where you'll find a link to the help manual. Read it, and then decide. Here's the link
No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.gamert.co.uk/HelpDocuments/index.htmlThere are no viruses or other tricks involved, although you shouldn't take my work for it - always make sure you've got proper virus protection.
The software is a straight forward physics application. One that you can customize through the use of templates to do most calculations.I hope this answers your questions.

The best place to start, apart from reading the manual, is to select the Graphical Output button, this will display another window with the values displayed graphically as 2 triangles - initial and result (should really have called them triangle 1 and triangle 2 because they are completely independant of each other). When the window is opened up initially - unless you've changed the default values, the triangles will be overlayed on each other - same values.Put the mouse over either of the points T or D and hold down the left mouse button to drag the point. As you're doing this you will see the values in the main window updating.
Open up the Results Output and again drag the point, you will get the output line by line.
A simple one to start with is to grab D and move it left, you will see that the energy remains constant, mass decreases, but density increases - just as it should.Once you've got the hang of this, enter a value into one of the fields, when you exit, by tab or selecting another field, the triangle will be recalculated, and redisplayed in the graphics window.
A good one to try is to select file->new, select Relative and find the velocity angle where Relativistic mass is double the original mass, read of the velocity and check against generally accepted figures. At the same time, check the new value of time, it should be twice what it was originally.You can select the Templates menu at the top and load one of the predefined templates. When you load it, follow the instructions in the pop-up window.Give it a go, you'll like it, I do.As for 'Relationship' that is what this tool is all about. As to how we actually describe what it's doing, we're keeping that to ourselves for the time. I'm sure some people will figure it out - maybe.

This is completely new, so new that the search engines have'nt even updated with details of the Gamert site yet and the ink is still wet on the web pages. Yes I am plugging my software, but where better.
As for previous publications, we have been trying for a considerable time to get the HLT published, one of the problems was the scope - everything ! So just at the point were we thought we would have this extremely useful Tool doing nothing forever, we decided to publish it in the form of an application.Neither myself - the Hooper bit - nor my collegue Luck have published anything in the physics world before. Hence why you wont find any reference in any journals.Sadly the documentation is lacking, although the principle is very simple. The whole Universe is based around Energy, and for such a complex structure to be stable, it must be based on a very simple set of rules.
The Conservation of Energy is the primary rule. All the other conservation laws depend on this.
With conservation of energy, any process must first and foremost adhere to this rule. This is true from micro to macro.
This then makes energy the basis for the HLT.
All that is important is energy and its relationships.
Everything can be built from these relationships.To date we have not found a single application where this tool cannot be applied - that's throwing the gaunlet down.Try it. Let me know what you think.

The Triangle is an abstract tool demonstrating the relationship between energy and mass.As far as a model it is based on, there is none, well not that we know of, and believe me we've looked.As to what it calculates, because of its abstract nature, it has no limitation of scope, so effectively anything you can think of to do with energy.
For example the previous posts (which I miscalculated initially) about the mass of a photon.
Or take it to the other extreme and you can determine that Ultraviolet light has a minimum escape radius within a blackhole (of 30 solar masses) of 78 km (first order approximation using Schwarzchild radius puts it at 88.4 km)
Use Ohm's Law to calculate the resistance in a system using current and voltage.The general reasoning behind the triangle is simple, there are 2 rules.Rule 1. Energy can neither be destroyed no created (Conservation Law)
Rule 2. If not, Rule 1 applies.There are no Magic Number or smoke and mirrors.Everything in the Universe is defined by its Energy. What happens to everything in the Universe depends on what happens to its Energy.

Ok, I'll try to slow it down.
Like you say, it may be perfectly obvious to the person that wrote it, but to everybody else it's not.Open up both Graphics and Results windows by selecting the button on the bottom of the main screen.
Let's take a very simple example.Boyle's LawTo best see the results, select the template menu from the top of the main screen and load up the Boyles-law template. You will see the column names in the Results window change.
For this example we're using Density in place of pressure.Increase the mass from 5 units to 10 units. You will notice that the energy has increased from 5 to 10 units and the value of the Relationship has increased.
Also notice that the value for Density and Time has remained the same.So from this example we can see that so while Density and Time remain constant, any increase in mass produces a proportional increase in energy.
You can also see the output in the Results window, where the volume, as you would expect has now doubled.Now set the focus on Relationship. We want to alter the relationship between Energy and Mass, up until now we have had it at 1 to 1. We want the program to recalculate the relationship based on a new set of figures.Reduce the mass from 10 back down to 5.You will see that the value of the Relationship has changed, but energy has remained the same.
You should also notice that density has changed. The Results window shows that the value of the Density has doubled, and with it the volume has been reduced.
You halved the mass, doubled the density and reduced the volume by 3 quarters.Because we allowed the Relationship to change, the Density was forced to change with it.There you go, try it

We've tested it on NT,2000 and XP with no problems.
Unfortunately I don't have access to an ME machine - something for my list to Santa.I'll have a look around and see if I can find the 'Please make this run on ME' flag.It's a bit of a bind, but the HLT works just as well on paper.
Draw it out, unfortunately you'll have to do the maths yourself, but it ain't rocket science.
Use the figures I posted previously using a right angled triangle, plug them into a spreadsheet to calculate the angles and sides when you change the mass and take the tan of the angle opposite energy to give you the relative density/pressure.