Marxism vs Socialism vs Communism vs Totalitarianisms

Well according to the Bible Jesus lived in a communistic community but was unable to abide by the rules and so used luxuries for himself instead of the poor. The account is found in Matthew, Mark and John. Luke has a somewhat different version of the story.But communism and gun ownership are totally unrelated so I have no idea how the two concepts ever got conflated.From the Bible stories it seem Jesus would have espoused Communism over Capitalism but would likely not have the moral capability to follow through.

Too often it seems that opposition to communism is based not on reality or even the writings of those who developed the concept and just like the support for "Biblical Christianity" not what is actually written but rather fantasies.One of the most prolific of the Communist philosophy was Leon Trotsky and fortunately much of what he wrote are available in ebook format and by date.His writings are particularly important since they serve as clear indicators of the differences between Communism and Stalinism.

I don't preach anything Phat, just report what the authors of the New Testament stories wrote.It has absolutely nothing to do with being for or against anyone but rather honestly reporting what was actually written.The Bible does support totalitarianism. That is simply a fact.Or should I do like the apologists and make up shit that is not in the story to make it mean something other than what was written?Have you ever actually read the Bible Phat?

Not quite Phat; I simply report what the Bible says.

HUH? Why can't we be better than Jesus was?What excuse did Jesus give in the story?I say Jesus is a failed messiah (not was a failed messiah) because none of the requirements of being a messiah, Jewish or Christian, have been fulfilled. I have no idea what that even means or how that could even be answered by anyone.What does any of this have to do with the topic beyond what I pointed out; that Jesus lived in a Communistic society and yet did not live by the economic system instead choosing his personal comfort over the communal needs.