|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolution. We Have The Fossils. We Win. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
That's right you haven't accepted anything. Infact none of you guys have. You operate like a collective. Are you and your forum buddies just one massive entity? You all share the same views and opinions? What kind of group think is this? You do know the globalists are masters of mind-control? Yes, why else do we all think that two plus two is four, rather than five, or seventeen, or a small yak called Ethel? Such uniformity of opinion can only be caused by the globalists.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Sure people make stuff up. But why would you carefully handcraft a skull with such great precision. Money? Well they aren't getting any from me. Not only that by why would many many different countries craft the same elongated type skulls over and over again. Who benefits? The museums? Well you aren't jumping on the first flight there are you? Do you think it might be the globalists? And as for extracting DNA from a plastic replica, I guess they are just getting bolder with their lies. One more time. Everyone you're talking to believes the skulls are genuine. If you wish to argue with us, you need to put forward a proposition that we don't believe, and not a proposition that we all say is undoubtedly true. Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Which ever excuse works best eh. So based on this pattern I kinda figure that giant skeletons really do exist. Could I remind you once more that we have the skeletons that go with the skulls and they are not giant. This is evidence against your thesis that they are giant.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Actually I have - but you chose to ignore it. Megalithic structures eg the Sacsayhauman. You know that normal-sized people can move rocks, right? So why are rocks evidence of giants rather than of normal people, or for that matter aliens as you would doubtless be insisting if you were a different sort of kook?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Actually I have - but you chose to ignore it. Megalithic structures eg the Sacsayhauman. Fun fact, when Anglo-Saxons saw Roman remains they identified them as entageweorc --- "the work of giants". But there was some excuse for their confusion --- the Roman remains were indeed beyond anything they could build, and so they might be excused for attributing its construction to superhumans. But we, Big Al, we can build skyscrapers literally half a mile high, and yet you look at this ...
... and convince yourself that it couldn't have been done by ordinary humans like us, who can only do stuff like this:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Compare the Statue of Liberty with the ancient monoliths. Following its completion in France it was shipped to the U.S; broken down into 350 pieces that were packed into 214 crates. The steel and copper construction has a combined weight of 250-tons. Two and half million stones went into the Great Pyramid and the estimated weight is 6 million tons! The largest stone blocks in the pyramid weigh about 70 tons. However, there are numerous 40, 100, 200 and a few 400-ton blocks of precisely cut stones in Peru that had to be hauled a considerable distance and then fit into place at various sites. The weight of the stones rather than the height or the complexity appears to be the main issue here. Source --> Page not found - WORLD MYSTERIES The largest monolith ever transported is the Thunder Stone, weighing 1500 tons. As it was moved in the late eighteenth century, we know exactly how it was done. Here's a picture. Note the absence of giants.
It follows that moving big rocks is not evidence of giants, since it can be done without giants.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
You will notice that the ancient stones have been transported much further distances. And that they're smaller, and that the one you cite was transported by ship. Ships work without giants. Cargo ships have been built that can transport over 200,000 tons, all without any giants being involved.
How the ancients did so again and again, rock after rock is a mystery. Only to you.
Even your picture shows that hundreds of regular sized people are needed and I am not sure of its validity. Yes, hundreds of regular-sized people are needed. 'Cos of rocks being heavy. Why are you "not sure of its validity"? Do you think the Russians secretly used giants to move the Thunder Stone but didn't tell anyone?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Why do you trust the information provided by the globalists without question? If you mean, why am I not ignoring all the available evidence so as to retreat into a fantasy world of my own devising, it's because I'm not stark raving mad.
And I notice you haven't even mentioned the giant tools. Why not? What are you talking about? You haven't even mentioned them. That was the first use of the word "tools" on this thread, and it's to complain that I haven't mentioned them? Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
There are plenty of sites which mention giant tools. A proper study on the subject would at least discuss their authenticity but your omission is interesting. But not as interesting as your omission. Here you are supposedly arguing for the existence of giants, and yet you never mentioned these giant tools. Are you one of ... the globalists? What else are you hiding?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Proof at last!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Did I miss anything of the list? Well, there's the bit where you were wrong, we proved you were wrong, you know you were wrong, so now all you have left is whining about how we proved you were wrong as though that was somehow our fault rather than your fault for being wrong.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Thanks guys ... I think I did miss something of the list. Yes. There's the bit where we proved you were wrong. The pointy skulls are not evidence of giants, because they go with normal-sized skeletons. People moving big rocks is not evidence of giants, because people have moved even bigger rocks without giants. If there's nothing else you'd like to present as evidence, we're done here. Thanks for playing, you didn't win anything but you have our best wishes and our fervent hope that one day you'll make a full recovery.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Al, do you actually have any evidence that there is such a thing as a globalist? If there were globalists they'd conceal the evidence for giants, you must at least concede that. And have you seen any evidence for giants? Well then.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Imagine the globalists have plans A, B, C, D, E and F. Now imagine that plan F was to supress all knowledge of giants. It's hard to understand why they would want to do that isn't it? But if you have an inkling of what other globalist plans there are on the table it might be easier to believe that they want to proceed with plan F too. I know you are now going to ask me 'what are their other plans'? Well if you were to ask me that question it suggests to me that you have no idea of ANY globalist plans. Heck, some have even asked me what the hell a globalist is. This says to me that you need to do some background reading first. I can't and more importantly won't do this for you. Some here would like it if I spoon fed them all the data but sadly that's not going to happen. Others might already have the information and some won't lift so much as a finger to find out. That's up to them. So the ball is pretty much in your court. If you don't know what a globalist is - YOU need to find out. If you don't know ANY of their plans - YOU need to find out. And if you don't want to find out - I couldn't give a monkeys. But I do remember Big Al being so much smarter than this. He used to be pretty much the most reasonable creationist we had. And he never mentioned the evil globalists. So, I'm gonna call it. Big Al, you're just trolling us now, aren't you? You're having fun, right?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 314 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
An interesting new intermediate form is described here.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024