|
QuickSearch
Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] |
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9078 total) |
| PaulK (1 member, 123 visitors)
|
harveyspecter | |
Total: 895,087 Year: 6,199/6,534 Month: 392/650 Week: 162/278 Day: 2/28 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: SN2016adj | |||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
No. It means that earth time may not equal star time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
We see everything in time that exists here. How would we know if time did not exist the same or at all out there?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
From your link
"We report on radio-timing observations of the pulsar J0348+0432 and phase-resolved optical spectroscopy of its white-dwarf companion, which is in a 2.46-hour orbit. We used these to derive the component masses and orbital parameters, infer the system’s motion, and constrain its age." They USE time. Timing. Timing as seen from and based on earth time and space. Religion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
Who knows? Could be future for all I know or neither!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
Keep in mind that we actually do not know the size of stars or how far they really are! To know that we would have to know what time is like there. A ear may not be a year as we know it there, and light and other things may not take light years to do anything. The distances and sizes and what stars even are is all belief based conjecture, and godless conjecture at that.
Edited by starlite, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
Estimated means believed. Prophesied.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
What's wrong with I don't know? Why teach kids something made up to pretend you do?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
quote:False. Is is exactly what it means when talking about what we were talking about. All one needs to do is look at the fundamental basis for the 'estimations'. The post to which you are replying said: quote:Right...so that is false prophesy with zero proof. A statement of faith things will go on as they now are...or more exactly as you think they now are. Pretty lame religion. quote: False. Our sun is big and wonderfully made. It also does not work the way you think! In all ways you preach belief. quote:False. Distances cannot be known unless you know time and spacetime as we know it exists in the whole universe. You can't. Therefore you are preaching faith only. quote:Depends what kind of things. Show us some evidence that something dated a billion or so years old, had no daughter isotopes before any decay started at all? What, we must assume this or it is not 'science'!!? quote:False yet again. You can not know if there is more than we can see. What we can determine would be the chemical realities as seen here on earth! Whatever else we may not be able to see, we can't know about. How big or far the star is we cannot know. You are hopelessly limited. quote:In other words you can make the same mistake on more than one item! Big deal. Unless time exists and exists as it does here neither object is known as to distance or size! quote:That does nothing unless we know what is moving, and where...and when! quote: Yes it means only that, precisely that and nothing at all else. quote:The evidence we wait for is you proving time exists and exists the same out there. We wait. And wait. And wait. Until then all you do is molest evidence with your beliefs. quote:Insulting parts of a population may seem cool to you. They are bright brilliant stars compared to you so far though. quote:Let me help you with that misconception. You learn, I teach.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
Right, that seems to tell us it hasn't sunk in yet that you do not know. Really.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
Good so don't do it. My position is that to claim decay existed in the far past you must prove it first. Not assume it.
Edited by starlite, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
starlite Member (Idle past 2229 days) Posts: 83 Joined: |
I would not use science that is too small.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022