PT writes:
Access is one thing but a 9 billion/yr industry is another. It really shouldn't cost anything to have your govts ear.
You might think so which is why I said to achieve that would require a change in the Federal Courts and in particular SCOTUS.
Beginning with Buckley v. Valeo and continuing through a whole series of cases to the most recent McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission our Federal Courts have determined that money is a form of Free Speech, that Corporations may spend general treasury money during elections and that any limits on the amounts they can spend are unconstitutional.
In addition the current mess of rules (almost every branch, every executive area and every committee has their own set of lobbying rules) there is a major loophole going back again to a court case, United States v. Harriss where the SCOTUS decided while the various legislative branches can pass laws controlling lobbying, that the act applies only to paid lobbyists who directly communicate with members of Congress on pending or proposed federal legislation. So if they instead talk to staff or just speak in public and not directly to the members of Congress then the laws do not apply.
While the actual people holding elected position change regularly much of the staff remains the same from term to term. The newly elected may well bring in a few of his own people at the top but the vast majority of Federal workers do not just continue but are protected by law from being fired to bring in cronies.