Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Defence of Intelligent Design
bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 51 (79924)
01-21-2004 10:17 PM


I'm Bran,
I am writing a paper in defense of Intelligent design, along with all of my six other classes I don't have time to look through 200,000 google items so if anyone can point me to any good defense of ID. Any help is greatly appreciated. I am also a creationist and a bible believing christian and any insight from creationists is appreciated as well.
BRAN

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Cthulhu, posted 01-21-2004 10:23 PM bran_sept88 has replied
 Message 9 by sidelined, posted 01-22-2004 1:53 AM bran_sept88 has replied
 Message 13 by FliesOnly, posted 01-22-2004 1:12 PM bran_sept88 has replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 51 (79928)
01-21-2004 10:39 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Cthulhu
01-21-2004 10:23 PM


Thx
When i said good advise i meant it!
BRAN+0

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Cthulhu, posted 01-21-2004 10:23 PM Cthulhu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by NosyNed, posted 01-21-2004 10:59 PM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 7 by johnfolton, posted 01-22-2004 12:19 AM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 8 by Cthulhu, posted 01-22-2004 12:42 AM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 51 (80001)
01-22-2004 7:01 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by sidelined
01-22-2004 1:53 AM


Yes I do understand what ID means, from ireducible complexity to addaptational packages. While i do understand it i still am strugling to defend it at this time, due to a lack of good sources.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by sidelined, posted 01-22-2004 1:53 AM sidelined has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Darwin's Terrier, posted 01-22-2004 7:35 AM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 51 (80144)
01-22-2004 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by FliesOnly
01-22-2004 1:12 PM


Well were to begin, for starters you said nothing relating to the theory, you merely created a straw man and classified me as a religious fundamentalist rather than focusing on the arguments. In truth you have no concept of real science if you would like to give me food for thought than present real arguments based on science, instead of a bunch of crap about "oh it is obviously wrong", that's bull and completely unscientific. And for another thing those people are my friends and if you would like to bad mouth them then perhaps you can stop hiding behind you computer and tell me a place were you can meet me and tell me to my face. I understand fine science and the various theory's and would enjoy your scientific advise, if such a thing exists, and i will run my life and believe whatever i please and i don't need advise from someone who claims to be related to an ape.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by FliesOnly, posted 01-22-2004 1:12 PM FliesOnly has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by AdminAsgara, posted 01-22-2004 5:45 PM bran_sept88 has replied
 Message 34 by Loudmouth, posted 01-22-2004 6:12 PM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 35 by crashfrog, posted 01-22-2004 6:16 PM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 51 (80166)
01-22-2004 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by AdminAsgara
01-22-2004 5:45 PM


I'm am sincerely sry. Bad day at school may explain it and I'm truly interested in learning and am sry i blew up and displayed a truly unchristian response and would like to admit that my response was wrong. Flies I'm am sry for my misrepresentation of my faith and would like to continue on congenial terms and continued to benefit from the many knowledgeable men on this site. As for the ape comment, while accusing of a straw man i committed one and am truly sry. Flies perhaps if we could stick to science fact and keep my friends and my christianity out of our discussion and treat me as merely as an advocate of ID. I want to learn what the truth is and am coming from it with that I mind, not my presuppositions.
With Sincere Apologies and In pursuit of truth.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by AdminAsgara, posted 01-22-2004 5:45 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 51 (80174)
01-22-2004 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by truthlover
01-22-2004 2:34 PM


Thank You for you insight, i really appreciate it
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by truthlover, posted 01-22-2004 2:34 PM truthlover has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 51 (80184)
01-22-2004 7:57 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by johnfolton
01-22-2004 3:25 PM


Whatever, Thank you for all you insightful and helpful words, and i'm sry as well for betraying our faith with my needless comments and unchristian response.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by johnfolton, posted 01-22-2004 3:25 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by johnfolton, posted 01-22-2004 8:38 PM bran_sept88 has replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 51 (80191)
01-22-2004 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by johnfolton
01-22-2004 8:38 PM


Whatever, is there anyway i could get your email address i would enjoy corresponding with a fellow creationist who has apparently studies this out. You Can email it to me at brando@adgintegrated.com Thx again for the encouragement!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by johnfolton, posted 01-22-2004 8:38 PM johnfolton has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024