Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8936 total)
31 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: ssope
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 861,657 Year: 16,693/19,786 Month: 818/2,598 Week: 64/251 Day: 17/24 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A good summary of so called human evolution.
jar
Member
Posts: 31264
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 70 of 184 (802180)
03-12-2017 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by NoNukes
03-12-2017 7:49 PM


Yet
NN writes:

Creationist invoke a miracle to explain the beginning of live, while scientist invoke abiogenesis which requires a chain leading from chemistry on basic molecules to self-replicating molecules then to life. Neither side can claim that their required process has been observed.

Yet. There is a very high probability that before this decade is out life will have been created in the lab from simple chemicals.


My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by NoNukes, posted 03-12-2017 7:49 PM NoNukes has not yet responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 31264
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.8


Message 90 of 184 (808411)
05-10-2017 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by Davidjay
05-10-2017 2:54 PM


Re: Bats are our ancestors but not our relatives ? Evolutionary double speak
David the liar jay writes:

No, three of you said that primates (chimps included) came from bats.

That is a lie.


My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Davidjay, posted 05-10-2017 2:54 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 31264
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 148 of 184 (810757)
06-01-2017 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by Davidjay
06-01-2017 11:50 AM


Davidjay continues to lie and misrepresent.
Davidjay writes:

Inbreeding is supposedly one of your cornerstone proofs of evolution, as seen by Razz's dog graphics and supposed explanations, and so logically you should not be trying to degrade creationists by saying we inbreed together, as accoording to your religion that can make us better and more viable.

Sorry David but once again you are simply lying and misrepresenting what RAZD and others have said.

No one but you has even suggested that inbreeding is proof or anything or of making anything better or more viable.


My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Davidjay, posted 06-01-2017 11:50 AM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Diomedes, posted 06-01-2017 1:06 PM jar has not yet responded
 Message 152 by Davidjay, posted 06-03-2017 6:38 AM jar has responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 31264
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 153 of 184 (810930)
06-03-2017 7:52 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by Davidjay
06-03-2017 6:38 AM


Davidjay continues to misrepresent what others say.
Davidjay writes:

But then again, repeat your words to RAZZ and disagree with him and teach him that inbreeding is NOT a proof of evolution.

Of course, since RAZD does not say what you claim he says, there is no need to disagree with him.

Only YOU have claimed that inbreeding is proof of evolution.

Since it is so easy to check claims like these that you make; and since in all cases when checked it shows you are simply lying; is there any reason to think your claims about the God you try to market are not simply more of your lies and as worthless as all the cut & paste shit from your website?


My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Davidjay, posted 06-03-2017 6:38 AM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Davidjay, posted 06-03-2017 9:50 AM jar has not yet responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 31264
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.8


Message 170 of 184 (818386)
08-27-2017 9:36 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by Porkncheese
08-27-2017 8:39 PM


Re: Why so much opposition
We are certainly not going to debate YouTube videos as though they were science.

Sorry Charlie.


My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Porkncheese, posted 08-27-2017 8:39 PM Porkncheese has not yet responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 31264
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 179 of 184 (818413)
08-28-2017 8:50 AM
Reply to: Message 178 by Pressie
08-28-2017 8:43 AM


Re: Great scientific responses
Actually given the evidence we do have an inept inefficient designer is far more likely.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by Pressie, posted 08-28-2017 8:43 AM Pressie has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by Pressie, posted 08-28-2017 8:58 AM jar has acknowledged this reply

  
jar
Member
Posts: 31264
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.8


(2)
Message 183 of 184 (818421)
08-28-2017 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by RAZD
08-28-2017 10:11 AM


Galloping Gertie
As an engineering student he must certainly be familiar with the history of Galloping Gertie.


My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by RAZD, posted 08-28-2017 10:11 AM RAZD has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019