Creationist invoke a miracle to explain the beginning of live, while scientist invoke abiogenesis which requires a chain leading from chemistry on basic molecules to self-replicating molecules then to life. Neither side can claim that their required process has been observed.
Yet. There is a very high probability that before this decade is out life will have been created in the lab from simple chemicals.
Inbreeding is supposedly one of your cornerstone proofs of evolution, as seen by Razz's dog graphics and supposed explanations, and so logically you should not be trying to degrade creationists by saying we inbreed together, as accoording to your religion that can make us better and more viable.
Sorry David but once again you are simply lying and misrepresenting what RAZD and others have said.
No one but you has even suggested that inbreeding is proof or anything or of making anything better or more viable.
Davidjay continues to misrepresent what others say.
But then again, repeat your words to RAZZ and disagree with him and teach him that inbreeding is NOT a proof of evolution.
Of course, since RAZD does not say what you claim he says, there is no need to disagree with him.
Only YOU have claimed that inbreeding is proof of evolution.
Since it is so easy to check claims like these that you make; and since in all cases when checked it shows you are simply lying; is there any reason to think your claims about the God you try to market are not simply more of your lies and as worthless as all the cut & paste shit from your website?