Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9071 total)
71 online now:
Aussie, AZPaul3, kjsimons, nwr, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tanypteryx, Theodoric, vimesey (9 members, 62 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Upcoming Birthdays: Percy
Post Volume: Total: 893,044 Year: 4,156/6,534 Month: 370/900 Week: 76/150 Day: 7/42 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Year In Intelligent Design
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8968
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 47 of 50 (844682)
12-03-2018 9:59 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Stile
12-03-2018 2:21 PM


Re: Creation Science vs Regular Science
If you have an undisputed set of observations or facts... then they only ever lead to one single Scientific conclusion.

This is, I think, pretty rare. The set of facts often have multiple possible interpretations. Then there are ongoing arguments, sometimes not friendly, about those conclusions.

Only further facts may finally force a consensus conclusion that may become universal.

I think you have all that in mind with what you subsequently wrote.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Stile, posted 12-03-2018 2:21 PM Stile has seen this message

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022