Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8965 total)
65 online now:
DrJones*, frako, jar (3 members, 62 visitors)
Newest Member: javier martinez
Post Volume: Total: 873,152 Year: 4,900/23,288 Month: 21/1,784 Week: 119/353 Day: 21/25 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Year In Intelligent Design
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8905
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003
Member Rating: 4.1


Message 47 of 50 (844682)
12-03-2018 9:59 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Stile
12-03-2018 2:21 PM


Re: Creation Science vs Regular Science
If you have an undisputed set of observations or facts... then they only ever lead to one single Scientific conclusion.

This is, I think, pretty rare. The set of facts often have multiple possible interpretations. Then there are ongoing arguments, sometimes not friendly, about those conclusions.

Only further facts may finally force a consensus conclusion that may become universal.

I think you have all that in mind with what you subsequently wrote.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Stile, posted 12-03-2018 2:21 PM Stile has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020