|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,915 Year: 4,172/9,624 Month: 1,043/974 Week: 2/368 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Coffee House Musings on Creationist Topic Proposals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Dredge writes:
You left out "empty". You keep forgetting that you're a self-confessed idiot. (Of course, your forgetfulness is understandable.)
I have considered your comments with an open and unprejudiced mind. Dredge writes:
Your conclusion is worthless. The problem is in your feeble mind, not in what people are telling you. My conclusion is that I have deemed them devoid of merit."Oh no, They've gone and named my home St. Petersburg. What's going on? Where are all the friends I had? It's all wrong, I'm feeling lost like I just don't belong. Give me back, give me back my Leningrad." -- Leningrad Cowboys
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 104 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
ringo writes:
.... and then, children, something truly wonderful happened ... the Tooth Fairy came along, waved her magic wand and ... poof! ... all of a sudden the snake had hollow fangs!
The prey animals with thicker skin had a better chance of survival, so thicker skin became prevalent. The thin-skinned prey may well have become extinct because of snake predation. Similarly, the snakes with stronger fangs had a larger food supply (thin-skinned AND thick-skinned), which increased their chances of survival. You really shouldn't be laughing at ideas that are easy to explain.
You haven't explained anything ... all you and xongsmith have done is make up fanciful stories plucked out of thin air. None of your fairy tales can be tested and are therefore worthless as science. But such is the wont of Darwinists ... they don't know what happened, so they invent imaginative bed-time stories and then delude themselves that their fables have got something to do with reality..
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 7.0
|
wow, i was right!
and i was just making a WAGNER - a Wild-Assed Guess Not Easily Refuted. thanks, Tangle!"I'm the Grim Reaper now, Mitch. Step aside." Death to #TzarVladimirtheCondemned! Enjoy every sandwich! - xongsmith, 5.7dawkins scale
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 104 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined:
|
ringo writes:
I was hoping you wouldn't mention the fact that I am, without any doubt at all , an idiot.
You left out "empty". You keep forgetting that you're a self-confessed idiot.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 104 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
873
xongsmith writes:
No, you weren't right ... you just happened to dream up a fairy tale bearing a slight resemblance to the fairy tale dreamed up in the article provided by Tangle.
wow, , i was right!and i was just making a WAGNER - a Wild-Assed Guess Not Easily Refuted To wit: Snakes evolved venom fangs multiple times from wrinkles in their teeth | New Scientist And unlike said article, you made no attempt to explain the evolution of hollow fangs ... you simply attempted to explain stronger fangs. Incidentally, it never ceases to amaze me how credulous Darwinists are. Take said article, for example: Some space-cadet Darwinist scientists at a university concoct a weak, simplistic, far-fetched, untestable story about how hollow snake fangs might have evolved, and suddenly it's accepted as an established scientific fact by those gullible little children out there in Darwin World ... like you and Tangle.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 7.0
|
Dredgeings:
And unlike said article, you made no attempt to explain the evolution of hollow fangs ... you simply attempted to explain stronger fangs. you forgot this from Message 820: "start with a little groove on the inside of a tooth, then some are born with deeper grooves that are favored in that current environment. they survive at a more frequent rate and eventually are the major variant. then the deeper groove begins to fold together "
dream up a fairy tale bearing a slight resemblance to the fairy tale dreamed up in the article provided hey fuck you. you have the fairy tale, not science - don't try to drag the whole science expert work down by bringing it to your level!!"I'm the Grim Reaper now, Mitch. Step aside." Death to #TzarVladimirtheCondemned! Enjoy every sandwich! - xongsmith, 5.7dawkins scale
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 104 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
xongsmith writes:
In your Darwinist fantasy-world, what makes the deeper groove begin to "fold together"?
start with a little groove on the inside of a tooth, then some are born with deeper grooves that are favored in that current environment. they survive at a more frequent rate and eventually are the major variant. then the deeper groove begins to fold together
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Dredge writes:
If you don't understand the explanations, ask questions. Don't pretend you're smart enough to reject them out of hand.
You haven't explained anything ... all you and xongsmith have done is make up fanciful stories plucked out of thin air. Dredge writes:
They can be tested against the fossil record.
None of your fairy tales can be tested and are therefore worthless as science. Dredge writes:
Get out of the nineteenth century. But such is the wont of Darwinists ..."Oh no, They've gone and named my home St. Petersburg. What's going on? Where are all the friends I had? It's all wrong, I'm feeling lost like I just don't belong. Give me back, give me back my Leningrad." -- Leningrad Cowboys
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Dredge writes:
Well, you are, and we won't forget - especially since you insist on flaunting it in every post. You'll look a lot less stupid if you ask questions and try to understand the answers. I was hoping you wouldn't mention the fact that I am, without any doubt at all , an idiot."Oh no, They've gone and named my home St. Petersburg. What's going on? Where are all the friends I had? It's all wrong, I'm feeling lost like I just don't belong. Give me back, give me back my Leningrad." -- Leningrad Cowboys
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 7.0 |
In your xxxxxxxxxxxxSCIENTIFIC-world, what makes the deeper groove begin to "fold together"? Billions of random imperfect copies of the DNA that lead to variation and then, more often, the flatter toothed individuals die before they can reproduce."I'm the Grim Reaper now, Mitch. Step aside." Death to #TzarVladimirtheCondemned! Enjoy every sandwich! - xongsmith, 5.7dawkins scale
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
What's wrong with using google? He's too busy in the confessional eating meat-crackers and drinking blood. Those meat-crackers rot his brain. And the blood ... he's catholic so he's evil.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 104 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
It never ceases to amaze me how credulous Darwinists are. Take the article you've offered here, for example: Some space-cadet Darwinist scientists at a university concoct a weak, simplistic, far-fetched, untestable story about how hollow snake fangs might have evolved, and suddenly it's accepted as an established scientific fact by all those gullible little children out there in Darwin World. Embarrassing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9516 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Dredge writes: It never ceases to amaze me how credulous Darwinists are. Take the article you've offered here, for example: Some space-cadet Darwinist scientists at a university concoct a weak, simplistic, far-fetched, untestable story about how hollow snake fangs might have evolved, and suddenly it's accepted as an established scientific fact by all those gullible little children out there in Darwin World. Embarrassing. Sorry, I'm all out of food.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine. "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 104 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
xongsmith writes:
1. Why would the "flatter toothed individuals die before they can reproduce"? Billions of random imperfect copies of the DNA that lead to variation and then, more often, the flatter toothed individuals die before they can reproduce. 2. Even if a snake somehow evolved hollow fangs, how would hollow fangs per se confer a survival advantage? Are you familiar with the concept of Irreducible Complexity? Hollow fangs would not confer a survival advantage unless they were connected to the snakes venom glands. Good luck explaining how such a system could evolve step-by-step ... so far you've failed miserably. In other words, you're a typical Darwinist - you claim to know how evolution works, but you obviously don't.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 104 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Why are you using my girlfriend's image as your avatar?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024