quote:
Originally posted by ksc:
As you see, proof has ben presented that the coelacanth should have evolved.
Of course I don't expect the evos will agree...therefore, they will still cry foul and claim I presented no evidence and/or answered the question as to where their theory claims things need to change over time.
Actually, you presented nothing at all. Your original assertion was that the coelacanth SHOULD evolve. Several people have pointed out to you that it has, indeed evolved. Now you are claiming that it has not evolved enough or not at all. Do you just ignore everyone else's posts? Basicaly what you are doing is called moving the goalposts and it is a tactic all creationists learn early. Once again KC, your arguments are bankrupt.
Cheers
Joe Meert
PS: As always, I expect you to refer to me as "Dr. Meert" or "Sir"
[This message has been edited by Joe Meert, 05-10-2002]