Iridium Nightmare and Living Fossils

Regarding debaters who don't really debate, the forum guidelines discourages non-responsive rhetoric. IOW, after a few warnings to please engage in real debate and give real responses, negative consequences will be earned.We have 'lost' a few belligerant/nonresponsive people in this way, and I, for one, am grateful for the rules.It's nice to not have to bang one's head against a brick wall all the time.

quote:

---

Originally posted by ksc:
Just for the record:

​

As of now the evos have not been able to present a reasonable answer as to why the living fossils presented have not changed from the original animal of tens and hundreds of millions of years ago. I have presented just 3 examples as why they should have changed morphologically. You can re-read this thread for examples and explanations of the 3 reasonscand also see where the evo come up short with scientific answers.

​

The best answer was...they didn't need to change or who said evolution says they have to change.

​

The evo have had ample of chance to address the issue but have chosen not to.
Instead some have decided to change the topic of the thread.

---

Nowhere in the ToE does it state that every species has to change morphologically.Why is this an inadequate answer?The theory does not say what you claim it says.(I could always be wrong. Why don't you list a source such as a Biology texbook to back up your claim?)Therefore, you are putting up a false argument to argue against.