C'mon Jar! That's a cop out.
Gosh, you don't think that's doing this subject a bit of a disservice?
The fact that we go round and round on this topic is pretty conclusive evidence that it's a fuckin' complex issue. I hardly think it's fair to expect Jar to translate that into the finite set of platitiudes you're asking for.
The position of a moral relativist is that many moral situations are too complicated to be represented by a short list of generalities. You do Jar and the topic a disservice, I feel, by suggesting that it's a "cop-out" to recognize that.