OK Conservatives. Got some 'splainin' to do.

I never fell for any of this shit, but clearly many of y'all did, because y'all were the ones arguing with me back in '03.So, who wants to go first?

quote:

---

Don't forget the liberals who also supported the war. Hindsight leaves both sides of the isle wanting.

---

Other than Liebermann, I don't know of another liberal ('ol Joe really isn't one, anyway) who made anything even remotely close to the kinds of ridiculously overconfident statements I showed in the OP.Most liberals were more, "Well, OK, if Colin Powell says Hussein has WMD's, and the Nigerian Yellowcake thing is real, and if the CIA says there really was an Al Qaida link, then we will support this invasion."ALL of those things turned out to be false, so the liberal support was based upon false assurances given them by the Bush administration.

quote:

---

Then of course, nobody but nobody knows what the planet would look like had the war not been undertaken.

---

This isn't about "woulda, coulda, mighta, shoulda", Buz.This is about what the pundits said.And they were wrong, wrong, wrong.The thing is, I knew they were wrong, wrong, wrong, back in 03'.I never fell for that shit.You did.How do you feel about that?

Buz, you have often touted FOX News as being unbiased and a good source of information.I don't know if you noticed, but several of the people quoted in the OP work for FOX News.Clearly, their words are anything but unbiased and their facts were so very, very wrong. These few examples above are a drop in the bucket in the ocean of similar comments and quality of information broadcast on that network.Does this affect your view of FOX News being an unbiased and accurate source of information?