Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   O'Reilly evidence
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6525 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 4 of 112 (194798)
03-27-2005 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Phat
03-27-2005 6:38 AM


Re: Phatboys Rant
I agree whole heartedly, Phatboy.
The big lie IS that everyone can get to the top. Fact is, there just isn't enough room up there. And anyone who knows a bit about economics will tell you that the US (or any other country for that matter) rides on the back of the poor.
Think about it this way. I read somewhere that Bill Gates had so much money, if he gave everyone in Canada a Million bucks he would still come out a rich man. But could you imagine the economic chaos?
I mean, no one in lower wage jobs would bother coming to work. Massive devaluation of the dollar would ensue. Poor people are necessitated in our capitalist system.
The least we could do is adopt some socialist policies like France or Germany. But here in the US, saying socialism is close to saying Satanism.
As far as Bill O'Reilly goes, he's a right wing nut-job. I once read an article in the New Yorker about him, he’s full of lies. His entire back-story is a sham, the guy is not to be trusted.
But then again, he's one of the most popular disinformation distributors in the country. Go figure.
sp by PB
This message has been edited by AdminPhat, 03-27-2005 06:50 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 03-27-2005 6:38 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Phat, posted 03-27-2005 8:58 AM Yaro has replied
 Message 18 by truthlover, posted 04-02-2005 10:38 PM Yaro has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6525 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 6 of 112 (194805)
03-27-2005 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Phat
03-27-2005 8:58 AM


Re: Phatboys Rant
Politically, I would say that I am a moderate. Conservatives lean towards Fascism while Liberals lean towards communism/socialism. All told, I would rather be a commie than a nazi. Idealistically, that is, for the fact remains that I was raised in a capitalist free market country which has pampered me and teased me.
While I agree with your first staetement, I dont agree with saying that the left is closer to communism/socialism, it implies that the two are closely related. Infact, socialisim has evolved much since the days of marx.
I like the philosophy in the sense of Democratic Socialism.
Democratic socialism - Wikipedia
Democratic socialists have normally defended the role of the public sector, particularly as regards the provision of key services such as health care, education, utilities, mass transit, and sometimes also banking, mining, and fuel extraction. However, their economic vision has often included a mixed economy with a greater emphasis on worker and consumer co-operatives, credit unions, family farms and small businesses, as compared to authoritarian Marxist-Leninists. In India, democratic socialists have to varying degrees seen the traditional village-based peasant economy as a model to be supported and enhanced.
It could be argued that the reason you are paid well is do to socialist principals. If you read about the Labor movement in the early 1900's up to the 1930's you will see what workers like yourself had to go thrugh just to earn minimum wage and have a 40hr work week!
There was litterely fighting in the streets. People lost their lives just to make a fraction of what you make now. The quality of life you, and many of us today, enjoy is due to the struggles of labour in this country.
Basicaly the idea of democratic socialism is "ya your rich, and Im poor, but my society will make sure that neither of us are treated like dogs by guaranteeing the both of us a good quality of life."
I don't see Democratic Socialisim as a rejection of capitalisim but rather an upgrade to it
enugh of that...
The problem is, so much more has been promised to me that will never occur. Bush is lying to us this minute about social security.
Why can't they just tell the American middle class that our days of ease are waning?
This is easy, they want to quietly sneak us back to the Charles Dickens era. Basicaly undo all the socialy progressive achivemnts of the last 100 years.
After all, if they do that, the rich can get richer and the poor can get screwd.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 03-27-2005 09:20 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Phat, posted 03-27-2005 8:58 AM Phat has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024