Ruth writes;
quote:
The difference to me is in the labeling of sex as a service in the first place. It is a consensual act between thinking creatures, not some object that needs to be fixed, and not some twisted birthright.
I was using service more in terms of fulfilling a percieved need.
quote:
All said, I would have to concede that an individual can rent or sell a part of themselves for money if they desire, it is their body. Surrogate mothers and blood donors are technically in this same group.
For interest sake, do you have anything against surrogate mothers and blood donors? The difference, as far as I can see, is only that the need for these services are generally considered more acceptable. I personally think this has a lot to do with Christain perception of sex as 'filthy' and required only for procreation. I am not saying that all Christain beliefs this, or even that only Christains beliefs this.
quote:
I place more value on my ‘piano’, and it is a bit more than a sentimental attachment.
You are entitled to place as much value as you like to your 'piano'. However, why should other people be forbidden by law to sell or share theirs with whomever they want in exchange for cash?
quote:
I am thinking this over, but have to run, later, Ruth
Take all the time you need.
------------------
Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.
- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy