Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   My position explained
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 87 (169483)
12-17-2004 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
12-17-2004 3:15 PM


quote:
Also - the "possibilities" in Genesis do not require that I dissasociate myself fully from the science of the ToE. Yet the implicative atheistic/nihilistic conclusion of many, shall be swiftly a no go area for me, as that is totally against my beliefs - and the truth of the bible.
I agree. No one should use the ToE as a basis for constructing a worldview. Many theistic evolutionists look at the evolution of man through evolution as a wonderous miracle. The ToE does not require one to become an atheist and take a bleak outlook on life.
quote:
So this means I leave the door open to the possibility that God "let the earth" produce animals via evolution, and so - I accept evolution is one possibility of how this happened. But I do not think humans were brought forth like this - and also the text indicates that God supernaturally created magnificent creatures, ex nihilo. And so - I am more against abiogenesis, and the part of the evolution theory which says all life is from a common ancestor.
I'm still a bit confused. So you accept the ToE as being accurate, but you still believe in created kinds? Do I have this right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 12-17-2004 3:15 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024