Chiroptera
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 4 of 20 (124531)
07-14-2004 4:45 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by jar 07-14-2004 3:23 PM
|
|
Even beyond the gay-bashing (which is bad enough), did anyone notice something disturbing even the more "liberal" amendment? If the constitution amendment were adopted, each state supreme court would be forbidden from ruling that barriers to gay marriage would violate that state's constitution.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 1 by jar, posted 07-14-2004 3:23 PM | | jar has not replied |
|