Brad writes:
I kissed my first girl under the knee. I didnt know WHERE one was supposed to.
I too have experienced COPIOUS confusions in socio-sexual interfacing which though comic often have tragic results the genre dealing with such issues being woefully inadequate consisting MOSTLY of piecemeal and anecdotal informatory recommendations no coherent PRECISE barometer of anticipated reactions on the PART of the subject to any given ploy being extant. The topic itself seems irreducible to Russellian atomism and so remains UN-UNPARADOXICALIZED. Russell attempted to ground mathematics with his theory of TYPES perhaps unsuccessfullly but without some such DEVICE nihilism creeps into science.
As it can also creep into ROMANCE.
The above stated description of your aforementioned KISS indicates that you were able to put yourself into such a phsycial attitude toward the subject that in itself is no mean feat.
Perhaps you dropped a SPOON under a table as a ruse. I have ATTEMPTED such subterfuges myself but with negligible success the reaction on the part of the subject being usually the opposite of my anticipatory projections.
As a result of lack of training in the SCIENCE of SEDUCTION I have squandered many opportunities.
No doubt there is some evolutionary reason for the problems of hobbledehoys such as US!
Peace, RR
This message has been edited by robinrohan, 01-29-2005 15:21 AM
This message has been edited by robinrohan, 01-29-2005 15:29 AM