Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The bigotry of atheists
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 12 of 53 (495605)
01-23-2009 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by New Cat's Eye
01-23-2009 3:32 PM


Re: DA's latest thread
If this is bigotry, I would say it is justified.
If you want to go by the dictionary definition of bigotry which according to Merriam-Websters is "a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices" than everyone on earth is a bigot to one opinion or another. But if you read on it further refines this defition: "especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance".
I am not a racial or ethnic bigot. Just maybe an anti-idiotic behavior bigot BTW, I do not hate these people. I just think it is a waste of time, money and effort that could be spent to better use elsewhere.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 3:32 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 5:10 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 15 of 53 (495624)
01-23-2009 5:32 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by New Cat's Eye
01-23-2009 5:10 PM


Re: DA's latest thread
I'd bet that most bigots do feel that their bigotry is justified.
LOL, So that means you are bigoted about me being supposedly a bigot? Do you see the slippery slope here?
Yeah, its a bullshit term.
So what is your definition of a bigot?
Did you consider that intolerance includes a refusal to simply respect?
You are not respecting my "bigoted" beliefs, so that makes you a bigot as well.
And how do you define "respecting someones beliefs"? I disagree with the belief that a salt water stain on a concrete wall of an underpass is a sign of god, however that is not so much what I have a problem with. If one morning someone woke up and saw a image of Jesus on there pancakes and thought it was a message from God I could care less, they have the right to believe whatever they want as long as it doesn't trample the freedoms and rights of others.
However, if you read the story these people are wasting tax payer money by making cops and other public servents divert there time to direct traffic, keep people from getting run over, doing research on the damn stain, etc as well as media attention that could be spent better elsewhere covering real stories like the millions of men, women and children who die everyday of starvation, of sectarian violence or of deadly diseases. THAT is what we need to focus our attention on. THAT is what I get upset about!
Without a standard for idiocy, you're no better than the racial and ethnic bigots.
My standard of idiocy is that if your supernatural beliefs interfere with the rights and freedoms of others, than you are in the wrong.
But you've refused to respect them, bigot.
And you refuse to respect me, bigot. See where this gets us?
Just!? Riiight...
That's why your OP just said:
"Look at this. It is a waste of time, money and effort that could be spent to better use elsewhere."
...and nothing more
So you think this is a good expenditure of our taxpayer money? To protect people while worshiping a piece of concrete? To spend money and time investigate this rubbish on the news? That is a good expenditure of time, money and energy? Really !?! I could find a hundred better ways of expending this time, money and effort.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 5:10 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 5:46 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied
 Message 19 by Brian, posted 01-23-2009 6:08 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 16 of 53 (495626)
01-23-2009 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Artemis Entreri
01-23-2009 5:29 PM


LOL this is funny sofar. I have to agree with Catholic Scientist.
bigotry is a paradoxical term. in order to call some one else a bigot you have to be bigotted toward them. and then we are all bigots in that regard, so what is the point of the term if it is all encopmassing to begin with?
Read the posts before you chime in Artemis.
Catholic Scientist called me a bigot because I pointed out that I thought it was stupid that people focus so much time, money and effort (including tax payer money) on inane phenomena such as the image of the virgin mary on a piece of concrete of an underpass.
I was just making the point that if I am a bigot than he is as well for "not respecting my beliefs" (according to CS).
The term "bigot" is thrown around so much here, that it really no longer has any meaning.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Artemis Entreri, posted 01-23-2009 5:29 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 5:49 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied
 Message 30 by Artemis Entreri, posted 01-30-2009 3:16 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 21 of 53 (495641)
01-23-2009 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by New Cat's Eye
01-23-2009 5:49 PM


Tolerance and respect are not the same thing
I stand by my statements. If you want to call me a bigot fine.
Like I said, what you do in the privacy of your own home, I could care less about. But if you divert public money away from really important things like fighting crime, science, medical research, etc than YES I am going to wave the BULLSHIT FLAG!
BTW, do you respect the beliefs of a pedophile? No? I guess you are a bigot then? (I am being sarcastic to prove a point)
Do you respect the beliefs of the Heaven's Gate followers who committed mass suicide or Jim Jones who forced the suicide of all his followers?
How about Mormon fundamentals who believe in polygamy, do you respect there beliefs?
Why should we respect all religious beliefs? Do you respect all political beliefs? I would venture not. What makes religion so special to deserve our respect?
BTW, tolerance and respect are two different things. I tolerate religious belief as guaranteed by the 1st Amendment (as long as they do not encroach on the freedoms and rights of others). But there is nothing that says I have to respect these beliefs.
If a political or any belief is just plain stupid and detrimental to society, we would be foolish to credit this belief with respect wouldn't we? Why is religious belief any different?
BTW, you seem to not respect my opinion but in all seriousness I don't consider you a bigot, just in error.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : Correct spelling

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 5:49 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 7:22 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 26 of 53 (495683)
01-23-2009 10:23 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by New Cat's Eye
01-23-2009 7:22 PM


Re: Tolerance and respect are not the same thing
Tolerance includes respect...
It can but not necessarily. I can tolerate a certain amount of stupidity from the junior Sailors that work for me (this works in the case of children as well), but I don't respect them when they are being stupid (i.e. being drunk but not necessarily disorderly). Now if they become disorderly when they get drunk than I become intolerant and lay down the law. In either cases I do not respect there actions but in one case I tolerate there behavior and the other I do not tolerate this behavior. Now if they do something good and admirable, I both tolerate and respect there behavior. Does this make sense?
In the case of the religious people worshiping the image of the Virgin Mary on the concrete wall on the underpass, I tolerate there behavior but in no way do I have to respect it. They can worship all they want. I think the behavior is stupid but they have the right to worship anything they want as long as it does not interfere with anyone else's rights and freedoms. However, I do not tolerate or condone using tax payer/public money in any way to support this activity/behavior either through police protection or otherwise.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-23-2009 7:22 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 31 of 53 (497037)
02-01-2009 8:01 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Artemis Entreri
01-30-2009 3:16 PM


sweet! you are a bigot.
What a joke! This is what happens when you misuse a term from its original intended meaning by using it against anyone that disagrees with you that is waters down the term from its original historical context and itself becomes meaningless.
So, in the context you are using this term every human being on Earth including yourself is a bigot and the term bigot has lost any and all contextual meaning.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Artemis Entreri, posted 01-30-2009 3:16 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by ReverendDG, posted 02-01-2009 11:55 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 35 of 53 (497078)
02-01-2009 2:08 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by thief
02-01-2009 1:02 PM


Thief here...
Just wandered by to see how things are going.
I've written only a few posts here and there. In return I've been called an idiot, a prophet, incoherent, and suspended.
Then I return to find this thread.
Oh my God!
Already the martyr complex after only 29 posts, Thief? I have been called many of the same names on and off this board, both in real life as well as my virtual existence on the internet, but have a thick skin and I let these stupid little assessments of a person who they have never actually personally met, go in one ear and out the other. BTW, I am also in the US Navy and a thick skin is not just recommended but absolutely necessary to be able to perform one's job.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by thief, posted 02-01-2009 1:02 PM thief has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 36 of 53 (497079)
02-01-2009 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by ReverendDG
02-01-2009 11:55 AM


someone rename this thread to "the bigotry of bigotry"
i mean really, thats all the topic ever ends up being.
true bigots try the stupid claim that someone can't be intolerant of bigotry against innocent people,
which is what they are arguing most of the time: defending themselves from being called bigots for hating minorities or women
Wow, that is from left field. LOL. Just to clarify, are you saying that I hate minorities and women?
Good grief. This is about the most inane, stupid discussion on EvC that I have somehow got sucked into. People are popping in left and right providing stupid little comments on a discussion no one really can quite get there head around in the first place.
When someone brings rationality and logic to this discussion I will chime back in, otherwise you guys have fun discussing who it more of a bigot against bigotry.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by ReverendDG, posted 02-01-2009 11:55 AM ReverendDG has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by cavediver, posted 02-01-2009 2:24 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 38 of 53 (497081)
02-01-2009 2:34 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by cavediver
02-01-2009 2:24 PM


The bigotry of those who are bigoted against being anti-bigoted
If RevDG was backing me, I apologize. His post was a comment to mine and I seemed to have gotten confused.
Besides, I have lost track as to what is actually being argued here, i.e the bigotry of being anti-bigoted, so I am backing out with what little dignity I have left
This all seemed to have started when CatholicScientist called me a bigot for me being angry against public funding being used to support religious fanatics in Califiornia worshiping a piece of concrete that looks like the Virgin Mary and "disrespecting" there religious beliefs.
BTW, I have a tile in my bathroom that looks like the face of Jesus if anyone wants to pay me for it I will auction it off on Ebay.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by cavediver, posted 02-01-2009 2:24 PM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-02-2009 12:16 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 41 of 53 (497199)
02-02-2009 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by New Cat's Eye
02-02-2009 12:16 PM


Re: The bigotry of those who are bigoted against being anti-bigoted
Notice the question mark at the end? I didn't call you a bigot, it was a question.
And you blatantly disregarded this remark in Message 13 by yourself:
Catholic Scientist writes:
But you've refused to respect them, bigot
And like I said earlier, I could care less and am tired of being drawn into your endless anti-biogtry bigotry tirade. So let's just end this stupidity before it spreads.
CS writes:
From that? And why quote disrespecting? Do you find you comments respectful?
It helps if you not take my words out of context. Here is what I actually said IN CONTEXT (I will highlight to make sure you understand what I am saying and expound my thoughts):
Myself writes:
I understand not every religious person believes these things (i.e. images of Mary or Jesus burnt onto toast are some type of divine sign from God but why does humanity (religious or otherwise) even entertain stupid, ignorant, pseudoscientific bullshit phenomena as such? (Referring to the worship of pareidolia images) In addition, why does the media feel like this crap is worthy of being on the headline news?
As can be seen I did not lump all religious people into this category and I specify that the problem isn't with religious belief but rather with the attention, time, money, etc people spend and allow the state to spend on inane phenomena such as pareidolia which has no basis in reality.
Like I said earlier, I tolerate this behavior but in no way have to respect i.e. admire it. If you want to call me a religious bigot so be it however before you start throwing stones realize that my wife and many of my family and friends are Christians yet they do not call me a bigot even though they know what my beliefs (or lack thereof) are. BTW, many protestant Christians feel the same way I do about the Cult of Mary worship and pareidolia worship. One does not have to be an atheist to think this behavior is ridiculous and silly.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-02-2009 12:16 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 42 of 53 (497201)
02-02-2009 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by New Cat's Eye
02-02-2009 12:25 PM


No, that's not why I called him a bigot. You're just trying to force your definition.
LOL. I thought you said you didn't call me a bigot? Who has the short memory?
The refusal to respect is inherant to the dictionary definition of bigotry.
Bullshit. The dictionary definition of being a bigot is this:
Merrium-Webster Dictionary writes:
a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices ; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
Where does it talk about respect? Nowhere. And I do not hate these people. If anything I feel pity for them.
And how am I being intollerent. Have I gone down there and picketed them or physically kept them from worshiping this image? No. Have I even advocated keeping them from practicing this behavior. No (though I did say that we should not spend state money promoting this behavior).
I just made a comment that I think this behavior is stupid and silly. That is a far cry from hating and being intollerant of these people. But I am sure you will turn this around and say that my comments are bigoted.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-02-2009 12:25 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-02-2009 3:22 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 44 of 53 (497216)
02-02-2009 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by New Cat's Eye
02-02-2009 3:22 PM


You implied that humanity shouldn't entertain the phenomenon and said that it is nearly psychotic greed.
Ok, if you want to consider this some form of bigotry fine. But then everyone on Earth would then be considered a bigot because there is no one, including yourself, who respects every opinion they may disagree with.
Atheists disagree with the beliefs of theists,
Theists disagree with the lack of belief of atheists,
Deists say they are both wrong and God is a magic watch maker but does interfere in the affairs of man,
Agnostics say who cares (but I am sure I could find a belief they disagree with),
etc, etc, etc ad infinitim.
So everyone is a bigot. Nice going on destroying the historical context of the word "bigot" there CS
BTW, I am done with this topic. I am tired of dragging this stupidity through the mud.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-02-2009 3:22 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-02-2009 5:18 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3132 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 46 of 53 (497242)
02-02-2009 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by New Cat's Eye
02-02-2009 5:18 PM


Its not that I have some desire to consider these things bigotry, its that I honestly don't understand what it really is. I'm going from what I can look up in the dictionary.
Ok, that is an honest approach and I have no problem with this.
That's why I'm calling it a bullshit term.
I agree but many other people take this term very seriously, especially in the terms of racial prejudice. Having grown up in the South (southern USA) myself, the term bigot is taken very seriously, especially by very open minded humanists and antiracists like myself.
I don't know much about the historical context, I'm fairly new to the term.
Historically, especially in the US, the term "bigot" is traditionally applied to a person who does not tolerate other races and is derogatory towards these other races. Therefore, I don't think emotionally loaded and historically derogatory terms such as "bigot" should be thrown flipantly around anyways. In many societal circles it has the same effect but opposite meaning as racially derogatory terms.
Rrhain seems to think that you have to be denying someone something in order to be a bigot. You seem to think it has to do with treatment and that it can be justified.
Not really. I was just conceding because you seemed so adamant about using this term to classify my statements as being bigoted and I was tired of arguing with you about it. Honestly, I don't think bigotry used in the historical context of racial or even religious bigotry can be truely justified (at least morally that is).
There is a difference though between disagreeing with a person's behavior, which a person has control over, and a person's race, sex, or other physical characteristic which someone has no control over. That is why I do not think that it is appropiate to use the term bigot to someone who just disagrees with another persons behavior.
So is this disrespect towards the theists by the atheists actual bigotry?
No, and vice versa, disrepect towards atheists by theists is not bigotry either, in my opinion. This is just people disagreeing with each other people's worldviews. The term bigot is a relative term which different people use in different ways. But the definition I provided here is what many people use to define bigotry. Which is why websters dictionary stipulates the following: "one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance". There is an obvious difference between disagreeing with someones behavior and spewing hatred towards a specific group of people regardless of whether they are able to control these "differences" or not.
Maybe I strayed to close to this line but that is not what my intention was. I do not hate these people (there are not that many people I do hate except child molesters, murderers, wife beaters, terrorists, etc.) nor do I hate there beliefs, rather I feel sorry for them and hope that they can find joy and hope in something better than a piece of concrete that happens to possibily look like the virgin Mary (such as family, friends and life in general).

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-02-2009 5:18 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by thief, posted 02-02-2009 10:01 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024