Pure Energy?

I once had a conversation with someone on this forum about the plausibility of "pure energy". I didn't know how to put foward a convincing arguement that pure energy exists then because I didn't really know what pure energy was. So, I've been looking at CERN's website Error | CERN and after a little reading this is what I understood:All matter is a very condensed form of energy. All matter has antimatter. When antimatter and matter combine they annihilate which produces a 100% conversion to light. Now, if light has no mass then we could say it is a form of pure energy - could we not?(Edited to fix URL)This message has been edited by Mission for Truth, 09-06-2004 12:39 PM

Does no one like my post?

The "pure energy" I was talking about earlier really only had to do with explaining the scientific possibility of a Creator. My opinion of the existance of a God (in one form or another) literally changes day-by-day.So, when I explained that I had a chat earlier with another member about pure energy it was in the context of explaining the possibility of a Creator made of pure energy.I now think that my arguement is totally ridiculous anyway so I don't really wish to proceed. FYI, I sometimes take the less probable side of an arguement just to make sure it isn't correct, for my own peace of mind. (fixed a typo)This message has been edited by Mission for Truth, 09-13-2004 10:48 PM