Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why "Immaterial Pink Unicorns" are not a logical argument
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 68 of 304 (500076)
02-22-2009 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by RAZD
02-22-2009 4:13 PM


Re: General Reply
RAZD writes:
To answer Straggler's persistent tangential question - the believability is related to how much we think we know about the question, when we think we know a lot, we have a high confidence in our conclusion, and when we think we know little we have a low confidence in our conclusion, no matter what that conclusion is. This is part of the world view, not independent of it. Different people have different world views (their collective opinions and deductions they've made based on evidence, experience, education, training and knowledge) and will come to different (and necessarily) subjective conclusions. Once you have moved away from the area of scientific knowledge where concepts can be tested against reality, all you have are subjective conclusions.
In other words Straggler, the SETI project / excitement over the possibility of water on Mars / etc.. presume life arose naturalistically on Earth. That presumption, the product of a world view - isn't science - it's the religion called Scientism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by RAZD, posted 02-22-2009 4:13 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Straggler, posted 02-22-2009 6:24 PM iano has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024