I have defended Tal's signature on the ground that it is merely political satire, although I really had no idea what he was referring to and thought it a bit extreme. But having followed the discussion here, I think that if it really originated as an expression of something Rahvin posted, and Rahvin rejects it as a complete misrepresentation of his post, then I agree with those who say it should be removed.
Someone once threatened to turn a statement of mine into a signature line, in order for it to be mocked, and I found that extremely offensive -- even worse in that case however, as my name was given as its author, which at least Tal has not done. Nevertheless, because of the circumstances of its creation, and its offense to the specific poster it supposedly represents, I vote for Tal to change his signature.
This message has been edited by Faith, 08-27-2005 02:53 AM
™ Version 4.2
