Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ape skulls? Human? Hominid?
Phobos
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 29 (109118)
05-18-2004 6:52 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by jar
05-17-2004 10:11 PM


Re: H. troglodytes
Although interesting, I'm a little puzzled why chimps would be considered for the genus Homo given that the common human-chimp ancestor predated the Australopithecenes. Why not A. troglodyte instead of H. troglodyte?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by jar, posted 05-17-2004 10:11 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Unseul, posted 05-19-2004 10:14 AM Phobos has not replied
 Message 26 by Mike, posted 05-26-2004 1:24 AM Phobos has replied

  
Phobos
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 29 (110870)
05-27-2004 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by Mike
05-26-2004 1:24 AM


quote:
This is basically why a lot of human paleontologists are against putting chimps into Homo (as H. troglodytes).
So what do the chimp paleontologists (like Bobo Leakey) think about it?
But seriously, thanks for the reply. It makes more sense now.
This message has been edited by Phobos, 05-27-2004 10:03 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Mike, posted 05-26-2004 1:24 AM Mike has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024