What does ID theory say?

Can you explain why it is that ID theory never results in any specific verifiable predictions or discoveries?Or if you think it does can you prvide some examples of discoveries made as a direct consequence of ID theory?If not then do you think that this demonstrates a weakness in ID theory?Evolutionists would, I think, argue that prediction and discovery of new evidence is a key feature in demonstrating the veracity of evolutionary theory.I am interested to know how you counter this seemingly argument clinching position?

Exactly.An unverified and, arguably, unverifiable hypothesis.At best.As opposed to evolutionary theory which has passed numerous tests of verifiable prediction thus making it a verified and superior hypothesis. I.e a fully formed scientific theory.

So what exactly are the specific verified predictions and discovery of new evidence in these examples? The predicted, searched for and discovered Tiktaalik transitional.

What you believe is immaterial Science is not the subjective interpretation of facts designed solely to support a predefined world view regardless of the actual truth of that world view.Fortunately for us all there is more to it than that.Interpretation is not enough to ensure reliability of conclusion. The key to scientific investigation and the resulting reliability of conclusions is the testing of theories or hypotheses. Testing by prediction and verification.You can interpret to your hearts content and come up with all sorts of justification for pretty much any story. There is a reason why creationist interpretations make no predictions and result in no new discoveries. It is because they are untrue.Relentless bleating by creationists that they have an equally valid but minority interpretation of the same evidence is ignorant at best and dishonest at worst.