Bluejay writes:
Let's work with the Buzsaw Hypothesis a little bit. In order to make a theory out of, you'll need to test it. How do you test it? If the Buzsaw Hypothesis is true, what could we predict about the kinds of evidence we'd see in the Earth, in terms of the fossil record, genetics, and other things? If it happened according to the Buzsaw Hypothesis, surely it would leave some sort of mark. Identify these marks.
There are some tests as I understand the term
test. Perhaps you're looking for more, but again, less testing would be needed for the Biblical models such as the BH hypothesises than for conventional science models.
1. The BH (Buzsaw Hypothesis) ID model factors in some scientific tests such as compatibility to 1, 2, and 3LoT. IMO I've debated quite sucessfully in the EvC archives that my hypothesis does pass these tests.
2. The BH ID model contends that conventional dating methodology as not being applicable to the BH model in that the properties of a Biblical pre-flood earth and atmosphere would be significantly different than a more uniformatarian model.
3. The BH ID model would factor such tests as historical data, mathmatical probabilities, corroborative evidence, archeological research, etc supportive to the Biblical ID model, most of which are
deemed not applicable to conventional secularist models.
To go into these in depth would be off topic to this thread. If anyone wishes to be apprised on these one can click on the Buzsaw name for the index file of where the above were discussed in the archives.
{This, and probably the messages that led to this, are certainly off-topic. The topic theme is "make ID scientific and not religious", or something like that. - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner etc. Also changed subtitle to "OFF-TOPIC, don't reply to"
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.