The Big Bang and the visible past.

Of course not.The science only takes you so far. But you are not prevented from going beyond that, so there is no censorship. It's just that it is no longer science. It is speculation.Oh, and some scientists do speculate about such things. But they understand that it is speculation.

The terms "eternal", "intelligent" and "designer" are human concepts that are based on our experience in time-space. So, based on the standard BB model, "eternal" could only mean "since the big bang" and "intelligent designer" could only refer to some entity in the physical universe.Presumably that is not what you intended. Thus cavediver was asking for an explanation of what you really did intend.

The standard model is that BB creates time. So "time" does not apply to anything other than what follows BB. I'm not sure what you intended by "the BB is presumed to be temporal" but that is not anything that I would presume.

The BB defines time. And the usual meaning of "eternal" depends on time. So, again, what does "eternal" mean such that it does not involve time?

I think you now understand fundamentalist Christianity.

---

Jesus was a liberal hippie

That seems to have a high gibberish content.

---

Jesus was a liberal hippie

I have reread. It is still gibberish.It seems to say that words get their meaning by magic, and that therefore you are exempt from defining your terms since magic has already handled that.It is nonsense.

It is not a matter of redefining. Our ordinary concepts (time, intelligent, design) arise from our experience with what is in our world. They could not refer to things outside our world, except in a metaphorical sense. And if you are using a metaphorical sense of those words, then it is up to you to explain what you mean.As for "eternal" - there is nothing in our world that is eternal, as far as I can tell. Human use of "eternal" seems to usually be with respect to what we imagine, rather than what is. Since there is nothing that exists where we can compare usage of the word, people don't all have the same meanings. The only clear examples I have of intelligent design are examples of human design. And even when used with humans, the meaning of "intelligent" is far from clear and is much argued over. If used with the ordinary meaning of those words, then what you have just written is nonsensical. If you have a different meaning where it makes sense, then it us up to you to provide that different meaning.