Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Military Guns for Jesus
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 16 of 51 (543711)
01-20-2010 10:02 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by dronestar
01-20-2010 9:47 AM


Re: The PEACE is the Problem
dronester writes:
Umm, no. When speaking of war crimes, Nazi Germany is both an appropriate and "legal" subject. see:
You didn't reference them as warcrimes though, you refernced them as helping build up a nation. Which is still what I think we're doing over there.
Oh, c'mon. You gotta be kidding! Then your opinion about this matter cannot be very informed, can it?
It's also irrelevant. If there are crimes comitted, they should be dealt with. You can't seriously mean that because some people commit crimes there we should just abandon the people to their fate?
As in Iraq, it is the Amerikan presence that is CAUSING the people to choose the lesser of two evils, in this case the Taliban. That is why Amerikan forces are now considering to "let" the Taliban be part of the Afghan government. (Why did you put "terrorists" in quotes?)
They should conisder letting the taliban in. They have as much right to voice their oppinion as anyone else. What they don;t have the right to do is suppress anyone, something they would certainly do again if we left. The reason I put terrorists in quotes is because I don;t think it's a black or white issue.
When did that happen? You mean during their last fraudulent elections?
You're telling me they don't have more freedom now (especially as pertaining to women's rights) as they did before?
You admit Amerika is there fraudulently
I didn;t say they were there fraudulently, I said they were there to serve their own interests in the first place (which can be a legitimate reason to go). Now that they are there, it would be very selfish to just leave again.
the Afghans surely know this too, and surely hate Amerika for this, yet you are arguing Amerika presence is STABILIZING? Huh?
It's more stable then when we would leave. It's the lesser of two evils.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 9:47 AM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 10:37 AM Huntard has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 51 (543714)
01-20-2010 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by hooah212002
01-20-2010 7:17 AM


I told him that it was a form of indoctrination
Seriously!?
Its like a part, or lot, number. The company that manufactures the sites decides what notation they prefer. The Army just happens to be buying parts from a company that uses Bible verses in their part numbers. Its not like the Army chose to add these to the sites. How is it indoctrination?
we would now be seen as being on a religious crusade to save all the blasphemous Muslims,
By idiots... maybe. But really, a part number on a site is going to have a noticeable affect on our perception of being in a religious crusade. Pah-lease.
and that it is a violation of the seperation of church and state.
What do you think the seperation of church and state actually means?
Do you honestly think that if the Army buys a part from a company that uses Bible verses in their lot numbers then the seperation of church and state has been violated?
Its like they're buzz words for the anti-religious.
He recanted by saying that the military purchases weapon sights off the shelf....EHHH wrong, bible boy. There is/was a 660 million dollar, multi year contract.
I'm under the impression that these are regular Trijicon sites and this is their normal coding notation, not that the Army specifically requested these verses to be on the sites. That would make them "off the shelf" from Trijicon.
What are your thoughts on this? Should the U.S. drop the contract? Is it, in fact, a violation of the seperation of church and state?
Whoopty-do. No they shouldn't drop it. No its not a violation of the seperation of church and state.
Maybe we should hash out what the seperation of church and state really and actually means...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by hooah212002, posted 01-20-2010 7:17 AM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by hooah212002, posted 01-20-2010 11:15 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 18 of 51 (543721)
01-20-2010 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Huntard
01-20-2010 10:02 AM


Re: The PEACE is the Problem
Huntard writes:
You didn't reference them as warcrimes . . .
My very first sentence of my very first post in this thread described Amerikan war crimes.
Huntard writes:
If there are crimes comitted, they should be dealt with.
Yes, theses crimes are "dealt" with alllllllllll the time. Repeatedly. Here's how . . . Amerika gov and corporate media first go into denial, then minimize, then shrug its shoulders until the next incident. When things SOMETIMES go to trial, like recently, the blackwater employees who wantonly murdered innocent civilians, they are, not surprisingly, found innocent. The Iraqis and Afghans note this. Amerika ROUTINELY commits war crimes via attacking drones and illegal weapons that murder innocent women and children. ROUTINELY. Afghan people know this and complain. REPEATEDLY.
How is it you don't know any of this? You're not a dumb or apathetic guy Huntard. I read many of your posts on this forum, and generally agree with you often.
For every child Amerika murders in Afghan, we create another hundred enemies. How is it you cannot understand this basic idea?
Huntard writes:
The reason I put terrorists in quotes is because I don;t think it's a black or white issue.
When you originally wrote that leaving Aghanistan would de-stabilize the country, it seemed like you thought THAT was a black and white issue. Do you now admit this MIGHT also be a grey issue?
Huntard writes:
You're telling me they don't have more freedom now (especially as pertaining to women's rights) as they did before?
Wow, I just read an excellent article stating 9 years after the illegal and immoral amerikan invasion, women have as little rights as before. I will try to find it for you. Bottom line, Amerika couldn't give a damn about the women of Afghanistan. Or people of Iraq. Or Vietnam. Or East Timor. Or etc, etc.
Huntard writes:
It's more stable then when we would leave. It's the lesser of two evils.
Yes, you're repeating yourself. And as I'll reply again, that is what the Amerikan gov and corporate media want you to believe. Now, why don't you listen to the people who completely matter? The majority of Afghans want Amerikan presence to leave.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Huntard, posted 01-20-2010 10:02 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Huntard, posted 01-20-2010 10:49 AM dronestar has replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 19 of 51 (543723)
01-20-2010 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by dronestar
01-20-2010 10:37 AM


Re: The PEACE is the Problem
dronester writes:
My very first sentence of my very first post in this thread described Amerikan war crimes.
Well ok, granted. You can use Nazis.
Yes, theses crimes are "dealt" with alllllllllll the time. Repeatedly. Here's how . . . Amerika gov and corporate media first go into denial, then minimize, then shrug its shoulders until the next incident. When things SOMETIMES go to trial, like recently, the blackwater employees who wantonly murdered innocent civilians, they are, not surprisingly, found innocent. The Iraqis and Afghans note this. Amerika ROUTINELY commits war crimes via attacking drones and illegal weapons that murder innocent women and children. ROUTINELY. Afghan people know this and complain. REPEATEDLY.
Oh dear. It's that bad?
How is it you don't know any of this? You're not a dumb or apathetic guy Huntard. I read many of your posts on this forum, and generally agree with you often.
Because I live in the secure and mellow Netherlands, I guess. These things aren;t given huge attention in our media. We have soldiers there too, and I haven't heard of any atrocities committed by them. Thank you for the compliment, by the way.
When you originally wrote that leaving Aghanistan would de-stabilize the country, it seemed like you thought THAT was a black and white issue. Do you now admit this MIGHT also be a grey issue?
I can;t look into the future, nothing is certain. However, it's is my impression that when we leave there, things will not suddenly become peaceful, and all rights gained will be left unharmed.
Wow, I just read an excellent article stating 9 years after the illegal and immoral amerikan invasion, women have as little rights as before. I will try to find it for you.
I'd appreciate it.
Bottom line, Amerika couldn't give a damn about the women of Afghanistan.
Really? Are they really such big assholes?
Yes, you're repeating yourself. And as I'll reply again, that is what the Amerikan gov and corporate media want you to believe. Now, why don't you listen to the people who completely matter? The majority of Afghans want Amerikan presence to leave.
Ok. I'm just concerned for the people there. I just want the best for them. I don't think leaving them in the hands of a theocracy is. If leaving them in the hands of America isn;t either, then perhaps others should take over there, who those others are, I don't care.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 10:37 AM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 11:12 AM Huntard has not replied
 Message 23 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 11:51 AM Huntard has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 20 of 51 (543727)
01-20-2010 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Huntard
01-20-2010 10:49 AM


Re: The PEACE is the Problem
Huntard writes:
These things aren;t given huge attention in our media.
I sympathize. Neither in the US corporate media either. Keep in mind, this is purposeful.
dronester writes:
article stating 9 years after the illegal and immoral amerikan invasion, women have as little rights as before.
Ok, I should be able to find the article for you. It was only a week or two ago I read it.
Huntard writes:
Really? Are they really such big assholes?
Amerikan apathy towards the oppressed depresses me. Indeed, recently, in another thread, **** wrote how happy he was the way that the Israelis were handling the Palestine problem (murdering women and children with phosphorous weapons.) Certainly, not all Americans think this way. Just one too many.
Huntard writes:
Ok. I'm just concerned for the people there. I just want the best for them.
I know you do, I could tell.
Huntard writes:
I don't think leaving them in the hands of a theocracy is [best]
.
Nor do I. I can only think of an UN peace-keeping unit to help the Afghans, would be helpful at this point. Amerikans have lost ALL credibility there.
Huntard writes:
If leaving them in the hands of America isn;t either, then perhaps others should take over there
I concur.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Huntard, posted 01-20-2010 10:49 AM Huntard has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 830 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 21 of 51 (543730)
01-20-2010 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by New Cat's Eye
01-20-2010 10:15 AM


How do you feel about fighting a holy war? How would you feel if you were thrust into it, fighting for something which means absolute shit to you? Fighting something that you don't believe in? Going to war for the sake of Uncle Sam is one thing: soldiers DON"T have a choice. But adding religious connotations onto it? I know it's hard for you to imagine, what with being catholic and all, not wanting to die for religion. I'm sure you would want to. But guess what? not everyone shares your views. I met NUMEROUS atheists and non-christians in my time of service. Imagine the hindu soldier in that ranger battalion who is now forced to use this sight.
The simple fact of the matter is: these numbers DO have a religious connotations and they have no reason being on GI gear. How is it different then issuing a bible? Why stop at weapon sights? Why not make them pray to YOUR god before they roll into battle? Or make you pray to Allah?
Religion IS a choice. Christianity just happens to be the default one that is thrust into everything.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people
-Carl Sagan
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-20-2010 10:15 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-20-2010 11:28 AM hooah212002 has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 51 (543733)
01-20-2010 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by hooah212002
01-20-2010 11:15 AM


Why did you avoid all my questions and rebuttles?
The simple fact of the matter is: these numbers DO have a religious connotations and they have no reason being on GI gear.
The reason they are on GI gear is that the company that makes the sites for the Army uses them in their coding notation. It doesn't matter what notation they use.
How is it different then issuing a bible?
They need the sites. It just so happens that the company that the Army buys them from uses bible passages in their coding notation.
Why stop at weapon sights?
Because that is the only item they buy from this company? But what do you mean "stop"? They didn't even "start". The Army didn't choose to put these on there.
Why not make them pray to YOUR god before they roll into battle? Or make you pray to Allah?
This has nothing to do with that whatsoever, at all.
Religion IS a choice. Christianity just happens to be the default one that is thrust into everything.
And you're just letting your anti-religious fervor cloud your judgement.
The particular coding notation that parts manufacturers use on items they sell to the army has nothing to do with the seperation of church and stae, nor with indoctrination, nor does it have any affect on any soldier that uses those parts.
This is ridiculous.
Is there no straw you won't grasp at to fight religion?
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by hooah212002, posted 01-20-2010 11:15 AM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by hooah212002, posted 01-20-2010 12:32 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 23 of 51 (543737)
01-20-2010 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Huntard
01-20-2010 10:49 AM


Re: The PEACE is the Problem
Hey Huntard,
I think this was the artlcle about women's rights, still denied, in Afghanistan:
A Voice of Resistance in Afghanistan
zcommunications.org - zcommunications Resources and Information.
The following is also a very good read about Amerikan atrocities, and the corporate media cover-ups, and the true will of Afghan people:
Serial Catastrophes in Afghanistan threaten Obama Policy
zcommunications.org - zcommunications Resources and Information.
And another of corporate media silence. (Including the BBC? Shhh, here comes Straggler)
Were Afghan Children Executed By Us-Led Forces? And Why Aren't The Media Interested?
zcommunications.org - zcommunications Resources and Information.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Huntard, posted 01-20-2010 10:49 AM Huntard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-20-2010 11:53 AM dronestar has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 51 (543738)
01-20-2010 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by dronestar
01-20-2010 11:51 AM


Re: The PEACE is the Problem
Why do you spell America with a k instead of a c?
ABE:
I did find this:
quote:
In the 1960s and early 1970s in the United States, leftists, particularly the Yippies, sometimes used Amerika rather than "America" in referring to the United States.[1] It is still used as a political statement today.[2] It is likely that this was originally an allusion to the German spelling of America, and intended to be suggestive of Nazism, a hypothesis that the Oxford English Dictionary supports.
In broader usage, the replacement of the letter "C" with "K" denotes general political skepticism about the topic at hand and is intended to discredit or debase the term in which the replacement occurs. [9] Detractors sometimes spell former president Bill Clinton's name as "Klinton" or "Klintoon".
from here
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 11:51 AM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Meldinoor, posted 01-20-2010 12:03 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 26 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 12:08 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Meldinoor
Member (Idle past 4837 days)
Posts: 400
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 02-16-2009


Message 25 of 51 (543741)
01-20-2010 12:03 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by New Cat's Eye
01-20-2010 11:53 AM


That's a European way of spelling it. I wonder if dronester might not be American. He certainly seems a bit Americaphobic...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-20-2010 11:53 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 12:38 PM Meldinoor has replied
 Message 47 by Larni, posted 01-21-2010 8:12 AM Meldinoor has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 26 of 51 (543744)
01-20-2010 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by New Cat's Eye
01-20-2010 11:53 AM


Re: The PEACE is the Problem
It shows my harsh disapproval of specific American policies.
Satiric misspelling - Wikipedia
Huntard,
here's another article on women's rights in Afghan:
Afghanistan Wars and Women's Rights
http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/22890
"So if you say you are a feminist who wants human rights in Afghanistan, it's time to step back from the thrill of being an insider in Washington; it's time to step back and think about if maintaining empire, sustaining occupation, and killing thousands of civilians is really what your "human rights" campaign is all about."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-20-2010 11:53 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 830 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 27 of 51 (543749)
01-20-2010 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by New Cat's Eye
01-20-2010 11:28 AM


Why did you avoid all my questions and rebuttles?
Oh, I do apologize. All of your questions appeared to be rhetorical.
It doesn't matter what notation they use.
So you would be ok with Q'ran verse quotes? It DOES matter because if a soldier is issued this, he HAS to use it. He has to be dress-right-dress with rest of the unit. If it was a simple meaningless serial number, there is no qualm. What if Trijicon was, instead, a satan worshipping company and these verses were from the satanic bible? Would THAT be ok? it wouldn't happen because christianity is the defacto religion so anything jesus related is ok, right? Fuck everyone who doesn't think so.
They need the sites.
No. They are a welcome commodity to an infantryman to have optical sites. Hell, a well trained sniper doesn't even need an optical sight.
Because that is the only item they buy from this company? But what do you mean "stop"? They didn't even "start". The Army didn't choose to put these on there.
I'm sure they knew about it, yet didn't acknowledge it until someone else found out.
The particular coding notation that parts manufacturers use on items they sell to the army has nothing to do with the seperation of church and stae, nor with indoctrination, nor does it have any affect on any soldier that uses those parts.
And when does it become a problem for you? When it's a different religion, that's when. Look, I do NOT like that this ONE particular religion has majority rule. THAT is why I am against this. Why should those who don't believe in your bible "just suck it up" "it's not hurting anyone". Sure, just let bible verses slip in anywhere, right? no problem for you because it's YOUR religion.

Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people
-Carl Sagan
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-20-2010 11:28 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-20-2010 12:52 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 28 of 51 (543751)
01-20-2010 12:38 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Meldinoor
01-20-2010 12:03 PM


Nationality or planetality?
I often wonder, would it be better for the world if every individual considered themselves, first and foremost: Earthlings?
Then, in a less worthwhile tone, our nationalities?
I suppose this would be treasonous talk to many people.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Meldinoor, posted 01-20-2010 12:03 PM Meldinoor has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Meldinoor, posted 01-20-2010 12:42 PM dronestar has not replied
 Message 30 by onifre, posted 01-20-2010 12:48 PM dronestar has replied
 Message 32 by hooah212002, posted 01-20-2010 12:53 PM dronestar has not replied

  
Meldinoor
Member (Idle past 4837 days)
Posts: 400
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 02-16-2009


Message 29 of 51 (543752)
01-20-2010 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by dronestar
01-20-2010 12:38 PM


Re: Nationality or planetality?
Very true, I didn't mean to sound derogatory. I'm Swedish myself, by the way (although I now live in the states).
I just thought it was interesting how you spell "Amerika" and didn't capitalize "usa" in your profile. Just tiny cues that made me think you might not be the average patriotic American
Respectfully,
-Meldinoor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 12:38 PM dronestar has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 30 of 51 (543753)
01-20-2010 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by dronestar
01-20-2010 12:38 PM


Re: Nationality or planetality?
Hi Dronester,
I often wonder, would it be better for the world if every individual considered themselves, first and foremost: Earthlings?
Well said, dude. And excellents posts! I commend you for once again standing on the side of truth and righteousness.
When I get home, I'll try to find the znews article that gives specific reasons for our current interests in Afghanistan - from the speech Obama gave at West Point.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 12:38 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by dronestar, posted 01-20-2010 12:57 PM onifre has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024