Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Nipples
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 18 of 64 (503593)
03-20-2009 11:20 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Phage0070
03-20-2009 11:17 AM


Phage0070 writes:
Except that there are numerous limits placed on sex through religion; no sex with two unmarried people, no sex with someone else's married partner, no sex with anyone else than your marriage partner, no sex with the same sex, so sex with any other orifice, etc. Making sex so pleasurable as it is is unnecessary and even detrimental to the behavior required through religion. That is poor design, or at least unhelpful design. It actually makes sense through evolution where we want the maximum amount of sex that we can possibly attain.
How about another process of life, such as death? Death is inevitable and according to your views is not the end of the road, but it often seems needlessly painful to fulfill its required function. Did God just decide to get one last torture session in before you get pampered in heaven? After all you cannot really argue that you are supposed to learn some life lesson from the agonizing pain before death; you are going to die moments later!
But who says that the designer is behind religion?

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Phage0070, posted 03-20-2009 11:17 AM Phage0070 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024