Biblically, Was Adam The First Man?

Not true at all. You have fallen for a common disinformation trap/lie and frankly I'm sick of seeing this crap in every thread in this forum I've been in so far. Well I've only been in three since I've been here, Im assunming if it's in those three then it's in all of em.As a result I had a wee yarn with the Director of this site and from the horses mouth he's not at all concerned about lying or liars in this forum on the basis that the facts are out there for anybody who choses to search for them. He's got a valid point, but just for those who can't be bothered searching for the truth ( or simply can't read with a basic reading level of an 11 year old) instead chosing to believe everything they read, I'm here to tell you this comment is based on a lie/is a lie.Go to the Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 Inerency of the the bible thread if you want to prove what I have said to be incorrect. There you will find a tag team of disinformation thought terrorists (skilled in the art with a combined post count nearing 100 thousand) to support you but I assure you, you still wont be able to prove this fallacy as a fact even if every one of you turn up there to have a crack at doing so.God bless.PS: Biblically yes of course Adam was the first man. What is this get up? Seriously are you cowboys for reals or what? Or is this place a giant mind bending piss take of all things biblical? (rhetorical question)It's at times like this I wish I was an unbeliever because it would be so much fun being on your side, especially when one more fool like me shows up to take your stinkin bait. LOLWas Harry Potter the first wizard? Now let's discuss something worth while huh huh can we huh?Sheeeeeeeeesh!PPS. And this the "Bible Study" section of the Forum... ROTFLMFAO Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by AdminPD, : WarningEdited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.

Are you aware that Aborigine means original people?? Austrailians are not the only people with Aborigines. Sheeesh.Adam was the original original the aborigine of Abos. Please prove otherwise. Thank you.Throw away lines are the order of the day in here but I mean common buck your ideas up folks, if you don't want to be mocked until the rapture by me.And you say arguments over the word "replenish" seem silly. LOL. Serioulsy LOL!!!Look up the meaning of words before you post this sort of iliteracy please.Threads with Questions like was Adam the original cowboy are really really really silly arent they?Was Adam the first man to have a crack at shagging a sheep before he said "Oi God, stuff this for a game of soldiers daddy! Have you got anything better???I mean thats got more validity to it than this. " Biblically" was Adam the first man insanity....According to the Bagavadgita was Adam the first man? Might wash but not this keek!In fact " Aborigine" qualifies as the original flaura and fauna of a region as well - if one wants to be precise. Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

Why do you always want to push your own barrow in every thread??The OP is "Biblically was Adam the first man", not according to the Talmud and or Muhamud Ali is Genesis factual? Hello???? Is anybody home?? 17000 posts of this nonsense. Are you sane in there? I'm not going to make it to 50 posts without losing my salvation let alone my sanity in this joint. LOL (thats of course if it was a biblical possiblity if one could lose their salvation) Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

What I understand is; there is no single purpose to any of your 17000 plus posts other than to discredit and post disinformation about the vailidy of the Holy Bible.But no single pupose to any of the "stories" in the bible, how did you figure that one out JAR? Because - this is your biggest disinformation AKA lie I have seen you come out with so far.The single purpose of the 66 books of the Bible is the revelation of the Saviour of Mankind The Lord Jesus Christ and that is a biblical fact commonly known by, not only every Christian that has walked the face of this earth but also the 100 million or so who where slaughtered for nothing more than believing it, not to mention all serious bible scholars regardless of their religious persusion.So take your little purple telly tubby off your shoulder and put the chip on it that you clearly have towards all things biblical, at least that would be more honest of you.It's crystal clear after reading about 5 of your posts that you have a seriously transparent resentment towards the bible. Why? I don't know but I'm sure I will find out eventually. I already have my suspicians as to why. Edited by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, : No reason given.Edited by AdminPD, : Warning