There is a great deal of faith involved if you ask me to believe in evolution.
Well, we didn't ask you. Your qualifications to assess the presence of faith in science are nonexistent.
You have to believe that life can stem from inanimate life first of all, spontaneous generation, and then you have to believe that out of that, all of the complexity and information needed to create the designs we call life could do so via things we have never observed basically.
"Basically"? You're saying that we've "basically" never observed those things?
So which is it? Have we definately never observed them, or have we
almost never observed them, meaning that we
have observed them?
Evolution (macroevolution) is not observed.
It's not surprising that you're still ignorant of the observations, since, everytime they're brought before you, you shut your eyes and mutter loudly about Heckel's drawings, webbed feet, and how dishonest evos are.
But macroevolution has been observed. I myself have posted the proof a number of times on the forum. If a single-celled organisms evolving multicellularity isn't macroevolution, then evolution can explain everything we say it explains without "macroevolution" ever actually occuring.